Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Tough-Respawn/claude-legal-skills-franceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/jurisprudence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/jurisprudence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/jurisprudence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/jurisprudence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tough-respawn/claude-legal-skills-france/jurisprudence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00232 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
jurisprudence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the legal-france meta skill to research case law.
Workflow
- Search and read the relevant official web sources by default.
- If the user explicitly requests Judilibre, or has already chosen that mode
in the session, read
lib/judilibre-client.mdand use the portable client. Credentials alone never activate the API. - If that API path is unavailable, continue with the official web sources and state the limitation. In ordinary web mode, do not ask for PISTE setup.
- For Conseil d'État, Conseil constitutionnel, or EU courts, use the relevant official web source rather than Judilibre.
- Read the decision before stating its reasoning as verified. Cite in French standard format, adding a Judilibre ID only if actually returned by the API.
- End with the mandatory legal disclaimer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -2 lines b643852401a0
- 12d ago First seen · 23 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A ea31a7e79ea8
jurisprudence is a command published in the GitHub repository Tough-Respawn/claude-legal-skills-france (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 232 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.