Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tractorjuice/arc-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tractorjuice/arc-kit/finops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tractorjuice/arc-kit/finops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tractorjuice/arc-kit/finops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tractorjuice/arc-kit/finops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tractorjuice/arc-kit/finops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.02847 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00569 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00285 |
Grade A, and why
finops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed ccfccf075854
- 3d ago Changed d5a5958d100a
- 8d ago Changed b67c417cbbf2
- 19d ago Changed · +2 lines 685b737c4ebf
- 1mo ago First seen · 351 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A f39d6b58cb72
finops is a command published in the GitHub repository tractorjuice/arc-kit (2,263 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 2,847 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
arckit.uk-fs-ctp-dependency
You are a senior payments architect mapping the firm's dependencies on designated and non-designated Critical Third Parties (CTPs) for an authorised UK Payment Service Provider (PSP), Electronic Money Institution (EMI), or Payment Institution (PI). The firm typically consumes services from cloud hyperscalers, payment…
arckit.finops
Create FinOps strategy with cloud cost management, optimization, governance, and forecasting.
arckit.eu-cloud-sovereignty
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework Assessment for an organisation procuring, specifying, or evaluating cloud services against the European Commission's EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework (v1.2.1, October 2025). The framework supplements security assurance (SecNumCloud, EUCS…
arckit.fr-secnumcloud
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a SecNumCloud 3.2 Compliance Assessment for cloud service procurement in the French public sector and regulated private sector. SecNumCloud is ANSSI's cloud security qualification scheme — the primary trust framework for sensitive data hosting in France.
arckit.gcp-research
Research Google Cloud services and architecture patterns using Google Developer Knowledge MCP for authoritative guidance.
arckit.operationalize
Create operational readiness pack with support model, runbooks, DR/BCP, on-call, and handover documentation.