Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/transilienceai/communitytools/launchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/transilienceai/communitytoolsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.02624 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01312 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00525 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00262 |
Grade A, and why
launch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/launch — Run the detection + validation pipeline
No arguments. Claude infers the engagement directory from the most recently scaffolded engagements/*/ folder, OR asks the operator which engagement.
What to do
Step 1 — Locate the engagement and classify inputs
-
ls engagements/and pick the most recent folder OR ask the operator if there are multiple open engagements. Accept both naming conventions: newengagements/<slug>_<date>/AND legacyengagements/<date>-<slug>/. -
Confirm there are files under
Pre-requisites/. If the folder is empty (no top-level files AND no legacy vendor sub-folders containing configs), STOP and remind the operator: "No configs found. Drop files into Pre-requisites/ first — any vendor, any filename." -
Walk
Pre-requisites/flat. The new layout has no per-vendor sub-folders; every config file sits at the top ofPre-requisites/. For each file (skippingREADME.md,scoping-questionnaire.yaml, and.DS_Store), callfwrr.parsers._sniff.detect_vendor(path)and report the classification to the operator before parsing:Input classification: <customer-slug>-va1-fgtfwa.conf → fortigate (conf 0.95) acme-panfw-east.xml → pan-os-xml (conf 1.00) nsg-prod-east.json → azure-nsg (conf 0.95) edge-unknown.txt → unknown (conf 0.00) [skipped]If any file classifies as
unknownor drops below confidence 0.75, warn the operator and give a fix hint: "rename the file to include a vendor hint (e.g.*-fortigate.conf,*-asa.cfg,*-panos.xml) OR drop it into the legacy per-vendor layout (Pre-requisites/<vendor>/)." Skip the file and continue — don't block the run. -
Backward compatibility. If the engagement still uses the legacy layout with
Pre-requisites/<vendor>/sub-folders (e.g.engagements/YYYY-MM-DD-<customer-slug>/), the launcher walks those sub-folders automatically and trusts the folder name without running the sniff — old engagements keep working unchanged. Report which layout you detected in the summary line.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 121 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 761f81d7716b
launch is a command published in the GitHub repository transilienceai/communitytools (498 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 2,624 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.