check-setup

A setup checker for Salesforce CLI, the command-line tool for managing Salesforce projects and accounts called orgs. It checks installation, the selected org, authentication, and API access.

In plain words
What is it for?
Verifying the CLI version, default org, login details, instance connection, and a basic Account query through the Salesforce API.
Why use it?
It identifies which prerequisite is missing or failing before Salesforce commands are used.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/tsmztech/claude-code-plugins/check-setup
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tsmztech/claude-code-plugins
Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 305 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00012 $0.00305
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00152
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00061
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00030

Measured yesterday against content hash 2066913f6490, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

check-setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

salesforce-cli/commands/check-setup.md · 41 lines

What it actually says

Salesforce Plugin Setup Check

Run the following checks in order and report results to the user:

1. SF CLI Installed

Run: sf --version

2. Default Org Set

Run: sf config get target-org --json

  • If no value: Tell user to run sf config set target-org <alias> --global

3. Org Authentication Valid

Run: sf org display --json

  • If it succeeds: Show the org alias, username, and instance URL
  • If it fails with auth error: Tell user to run sf org login web -a <alias>

4. API Access

Run: sf data query --query "SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 1" --json

  • If it succeeds: Confirm API access is working
  • If it fails: Report the specific error

Output Format

Summarize as a checklist:

  • ✅ or ❌ SF CLI installed (version)
  • ✅ or ❌ Default org configured (alias)
  • ✅ or ❌ Authentication valid (username)
  • ✅ or ❌ API access working

User runs it as:

/salesforce-cli:check-setup

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 41 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 2066913f6490

Subscribe to this mod's changes

check-setup is a command published in the GitHub repository tsmztech/claude-code-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 305 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.