Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/ars-lit-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/ars-lit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/ars-lit-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/ars-lit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills/ars-lit-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00111 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00022 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
ars-lit-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 12 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 6a166a22e796
ars-lit-review is a command published in the GitHub repository tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 111 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
export-latex
Export the current paper draft to production-ready LaTeX (.tex) and PDF using the arxiv-style template. Converts draft.md + references.bib + figures/ into a complete LaTeX project with resolved citations, tables, and figures. Compiles to PDF automatically.
screen-papers
Systematically screen papers for a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Applies PRISMA-compliant title/abstract and full-text screening with documented inclusion/exclusion criteria. Takes literaturebase.csv from Phase 1 and produces a filtered, auditable set of included studies with PRISMA flow diagram.
audit-paper
Audit a paper's empirical claims against the linked code repository — catches MISMATCH, MISSING, and PARTIAL claims before submission.
generate-slides
Generate conference presentation slides from a completed paper. Extracts key content, builds a slide structure, generates content with speaker notes, and produces a Marp-compatible markdown slide deck.
respond-reviewers
Process reviewer or co-author feedback and implement revisions. Accepts annotated PDF, pasted comments, or reviewer report. Extracts review points, classifies actions, presents change plan for approval, implements changes, recompiles LaTeX, generates latexdiff, and documents everything.
search-papers
Search academic literature across Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, CrossRef, and arXiv. Runs Phase 1 (Reconnaissance) of the paper machine as a standalone operation.