Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/twaldin/honeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/twaldin/hone/find-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/twaldin/hone/find-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/twaldin/hone/find-issues/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/twaldin/hone/find-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/twaldin/hone/find-issues.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00948 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00474 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
find-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Find issues for PR command
Find open GitHub issues that a pull request might fix. Include all likely matches — do not artificially limit the number of results.
To do this, follow these steps precisely:
- Use an agent to check if the PR (a) is closed/merged, or (b) already has a related-issues comment (check for the exact HTML marker
<!-- find-issues-bot:marker -->in the PR comments - ignore other bot comments). If so, do not proceed. - Use an agent to view the PR title, body, and diff (
gh pr viewandgh pr diff), and ask the agent to return a summary of:- What the PR changes (files modified, functions changed, features added/fixed)
- Key technical terms, error messages, API names, or module names involved
- Any issue numbers already referenced in the PR body or commit messages
- Then, launch 5 parallel agents to search GitHub for open issues that this PR might fix, using diverse keywords and search approaches derived from the summary in Step 2. IMPORTANT: Always scope searches with
repo:owner/repoto constrain results to the current repository only. Each agent should try a different search strategy:- Agent 1: Search using error messages or symptoms described in the diff
- Agent 2: Search using feature/module names from the changed files
- Agent 3: Search using API names or function names that were modified
- Agent 4: Search using keywords from the PR title and description
- Agent 5: Search using broader terms related to the area of code changed
- Next, feed the results from Steps 2 and 3 into another agent, so that it can filter out false positives that are likely not actually related to the PR's changes. Exclude issues already referenced in the PR body (e.g. "fixes #123", "closes #456", "resolves #789"). Only keep issues where the PR changes are clearly relevant to the issue. If there are no related issues remaining, do not proceed.
- Finally, comment on the PR with all related open issues found (or zero, if there are no likely matches). Do not cap the number — list every issue that is a likely match.
Notes (be sure to tell this to your agents, too):
- Use
ghto interact with GitHub, rather than web fetch - You may also use read-only
gitcommands (git diff,git log,git show,git grep, etc.) against the local checkout - Do not use other tools beyond
ghandgit(eg. don't use other MCP servers, file edit, etc.) - Make a todo list first
- Always scope searches with
repo:owner/repoto prevent cross-repo false positives - Only match against open issues - do not suggest closed issues
- Exclude issues that are already linked in the PR description
- For your comment, follow the following format precisely (assuming for this example that you found 3 related issues). The fenced block at the bottom must contain one
Fixes #<number>line per issue, in the same order, so the PR author can copy-paste it directly into the PR description:
Found 3 issues this PR may fix:
If this is helpful, copy the block below into the PR description to auto-close these issues on merge.
Fixes #<number>
Fixes #<number>
Fixes #<number>
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 58 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 5206d0f13445
find-issues is a command published in the GitHub repository twaldin/hone (47 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 948 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
report-issue
Open a atomic GitHub issue via gh. Bug report or feature request — auto-detect from user's description.
roadmap-track.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
vision-adjust.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
vision-init.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.
vision-new-product.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.