autoresearch: Command for Claude Code

.opencode/commands/autoresearch_reason.md

autoresearch_reason is a command for Claude Code, OpenCode from uditgoenka/autoresearch. It costs 13 tokens per session (1,202 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of autoresearch:reason, MIT.

A structured debate command for refining a question, proposal, design, argument, or claim with several independent judges. It can continue through rounds until the same option wins repeatedly.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for software, product, business, security, research, or content decisions, with adjustable debate modes, judge counts, iterations, and convergence rules.
Why use it?
It exposes weaknesses and competing views that a single pass of reasoning may miss. The stopping rule helps turn repeated discussion into a decision.

Command for Claude CodeOpenCode

Written for Claude Code and OpenCode: argument-hint in frontmatter, but also installed under .opencode/.

This is uditgoenka/autoresearch's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and OpenCode how to work on autoresearch itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything autoresearch configures →

About the project

autoresearch is an agent workflow that repeatedly changes a project, verifies a measurable result, keeps or discards the change, and continues iterating toward a goal. It is for autonomous improvement tasks in Claude Code, OpenCode, and OpenAI Codex across domains with mechanical success measures. The catalogue contains its commands, hooks, skills, plugin, agent, and instruction.

uditgoenka/autoresearch · 6,270 stars · on GitHub · udit.co

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to uditgoenka/autoresearch. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/uditgoenka/autoresearch/master/.opencode/commands/autoresearch_reason.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uditgoenka/autoresearch

Made for: Claude Code, OpenCode.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for autoresearch_reason

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uditgoenka/autoresearch/autoresearch_reason/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/uditgoenka/autoresearch/autoresearch_reason)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uditgoenka/autoresearch/autoresearch_reason"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uditgoenka/autoresearch/autoresearch_reason/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for autoresearch_reason

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uditgoenka/autoresearch/autoresearch_reason"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uditgoenka/autoresearch/autoresearch_reason.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,202 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.01202
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00601
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00240
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00120

Measured 11d ago against content hash aa068f0682a3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

autoresearch_reason scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to autoresearch:reason — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.opencode/commands/autoresearch_reason.md · 110 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

EXECUTE IMMEDIATELY.

Parse Arguments

Extract from $ARGUMENTS:

  • Task: — question, proposal, design, argument, or claim to refine
  • Domain: or --domain — software, product, business, security, research, content
  • Mode: or --mode — convergent (default), creative, debate
  • --judges N or Judges: — blind judge count (3 default, 5 thorough, 7 deep)
  • --convergence N or Convergence: — stop when incumbent wins N consecutive rounds (default 3)
  • Iterations: or --iterations — default 8. "unlimited" for unbounded.
  • --judge-personas — custom judge persona overrides
  • --no-synthesis — skip synthesis, pure debate only
  • --temperature — generation temperature hint
  • --evals, --evals-interval N, --chain, --<subcommand>

Remaining text not matching flags = task description.

Setup (if Task or Domain missing)

question (single batch): Q1 (Task): "What should be reasoned about?" — open text Q2 (Domain): "What domain?" — software architecture, product strategy, business decision, security, research, content Q3 (Mode): "Refinement mode?" — convergent (stop when winner repeats), creative (never auto-stop), debate (no synthesis) Q4 (Judges): "How many blind judges?" — 3 (default), 5 (thorough), 7 (deep) If all provided → skip.

Setup Phase

  1. Load references/reason-judge-protocol.md for judge and convergence specs
  2. Parse domain → select domain-specific judge criteria
  3. Create output directory: autoresearch/reason-{YYMMDD}-{HHMM}/
  4. TSV header: round\ttimestamp\tcandidate_label\tjudge_verdict\tconvergence_count\tdescription
  5. Initialize: incumbent = null, convergence_count = 0

Round Loop

Phase 1: Generate-A

  • If round 1: Author-A generates first candidate from task description
  • If round N>1: incumbent is Author-A's candidate
  • Cold-start: Author-A sees ONLY task description + domain context

Phase 2: Critic

  • Critic receives candidate-A (cold-start, no shared session)
  • MUST find at least 3 specific weaknesses
  • MUST suggest what a superior candidate would do differently
  • Role is purely adversarial — never compliment

Read the full file on GitHub · 110 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 110 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A aa068f0682a3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

autoresearch_reason is a command published in the GitHub repository uditgoenka/autoresearch (6,270 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,202 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to autoresearch:reason, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.