Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UiPath/coder_evalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/uipath/coder_eval/coder-eval-create-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uipath/coder_eval/coder-eval-create-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uipath/coder_eval/coder-eval-create-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uipath/coder_eval/coder-eval-create-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uipath/coder_eval/coder-eval-create-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.04320 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01728 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00864 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00432 |
Grade A, and why
coder-eval-create-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
- Current git status: !
git status --short - Current branch: !
git branch --show-current - Recent commits: !
git log --oneline -5
Your task
Produce a detailed, phased plan that a fresh session with no memory of this conversation can execute via /coder-eval-implement-plan. The plan is the contract between you and the implementer — it must be self-contained. The implementer drives directly off these parts, so each must be concrete:
- Per phase:
Changes,Edge Cases,Tests to Write,Tests to Run(real scopeduv run pytest …commands),Acceptance Criteria(verifiable, with checkboxes), and aRisktag (Low / High — sets the implementer's review depth). - Global:
Patterns to Mirror(actual code snippets from this repo, not descriptions),Design Context,Master Acceptance Checklist,Confidence Score.
The input may be a feature description, a file path to a spec/design doc (read it first), a bug list, or a combination.
Follow these steps:
-
Gather input — If the user references a file, read it in full first. If it's a bug list, enumerate each item. If it's a direct description, use it as-is.
-
Understand & classify — Restate the goal in one or two sentences. If there are multiple items, summarize scope and list each. Then classify:
Level Indicators Small 1-3 files, follows existing patterns, <100 new lines, single phase Medium 3-10 files, one new criterion / one CLI flag group / one model addition, 2-4 phases Large 10+ files, new agent or cross-module interaction (orchestrator + models + criteria), 5+ phases XL Architectural change, new subsystem, migration of an existing contract — split into multiple plans For Small, collapse to one phase (or a flat task list). For XL, stop now — present the classification rationale and a proposed split, and wait for user confirmation before any further research or planning.
-
Research the codebase — Read all relevant files to understand the current state. Implement by mirroring and re-using existing patterns, not inventing. Pay special attention to:
coder_eval/models/— Pydantic data models (all importable fromcoder_eval.models; declared once, consumed everywhere — SSOT)coder_eval/criteria/— Plugin registry with auto-discovery via@register_criterion;SuccessCriteriondiscriminated union inmodels/criteria.pycoder_eval/agents/+coder_eval/plugins.py— Agent ABC implementations registered through thecoder_eval.pluginsentry-point SPI againstAgentRegistry.agent.typeis an open string;Orchestrator._create_agentdelegates to the registry'screate_agent()factory (agents/registry.py) instead of dispatching by kind, so you add an agent via aregister(registry)hook — not by editing_create_agentor theAgentKindenum (models/enums.py, which lists only the known built-in kinds)coder_eval/orchestration/— Batch execution, experiment resolution, and the single declarative merge resolver (config_merge.py::resolve_root)coder_eval/cli/— Typer + Rich CLI commands; generic-D/--setoverrides (orchestration/overrides.py)coder_eval/streaming/— Real-time agent event streaming; the agent is the sole emitter andEventCollectoris the single TurnRecord capture seamtests/lint/rules/— custom architectural lint rules (CE001–CExxx), the project's harness for mechanically-enforced invariants
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 219 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 8a00196fd548
coder-eval-create-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository UiPath/coder_eval (151 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 4,320 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
task-verify
PitWay: Run an inprogress task's approved verification command and persist evidence.
usage-add
PitWay: Accumulate measured planning or qa token usage onto a milestone.
milestone-list
PitWay: List every milestone with a concise one-line status.
recall
Recall durable project context for a concrete question.
handoff
Export a Waybill Bundle by default, or import one when requested.
fix
Universal debugging and fix application with semantic code analysis.