coder-eval-create-plan

A command that turns a feature request, bug list, or design document into a detailed, phased implementation plan for the Coder Eval codebase.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare multi-phase coding work, document patterns to copy, define real test commands, and create a checklist for completion.
Why use it?
It gives another session a self-contained plan with concrete changes, tests, risks, and acceptance checks to follow.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/uipath/coder_eval/coder-eval-create-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UiPath/coder_eval

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,320 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00032 $0.04320
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.02160
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00864
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00432

Measured yesterday against content hash 8a00196fd548, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coder-eval-create-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/coder-eval-create-plan.md · 219 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Context

  • Current git status: !git status --short
  • Current branch: !git branch --show-current
  • Recent commits: !git log --oneline -5

Your task

Produce a detailed, phased plan that a fresh session with no memory of this conversation can execute via /coder-eval-implement-plan. The plan is the contract between you and the implementer — it must be self-contained. The implementer drives directly off these parts, so each must be concrete:

  • Per phase: Changes, Edge Cases, Tests to Write, Tests to Run (real scoped uv run pytest … commands), Acceptance Criteria (verifiable, with checkboxes), and a Risk tag (Low / High — sets the implementer's review depth).
  • Global: Patterns to Mirror (actual code snippets from this repo, not descriptions), Design Context, Master Acceptance Checklist, Confidence Score.

The input may be a feature description, a file path to a spec/design doc (read it first), a bug list, or a combination.

Follow these steps:

  1. Gather input — If the user references a file, read it in full first. If it's a bug list, enumerate each item. If it's a direct description, use it as-is.

  2. Understand & classify — Restate the goal in one or two sentences. If there are multiple items, summarize scope and list each. Then classify:

    Level Indicators
    Small 1-3 files, follows existing patterns, <100 new lines, single phase
    Medium 3-10 files, one new criterion / one CLI flag group / one model addition, 2-4 phases
    Large 10+ files, new agent or cross-module interaction (orchestrator + models + criteria), 5+ phases
    XL Architectural change, new subsystem, migration of an existing contract — split into multiple plans

    For Small, collapse to one phase (or a flat task list). For XL, stop now — present the classification rationale and a proposed split, and wait for user confirmation before any further research or planning.

  3. Research the codebase — Read all relevant files to understand the current state. Implement by mirroring and re-using existing patterns, not inventing. Pay special attention to:

    • coder_eval/models/ — Pydantic data models (all importable from coder_eval.models; declared once, consumed everywhere — SSOT)
    • coder_eval/criteria/ — Plugin registry with auto-discovery via @register_criterion; SuccessCriterion discriminated union in models/criteria.py
    • coder_eval/agents/ + coder_eval/plugins.py — Agent ABC implementations registered through the coder_eval.plugins entry-point SPI against AgentRegistry. agent.type is an open string; Orchestrator._create_agent delegates to the registry's create_agent() factory (agents/registry.py) instead of dispatching by kind, so you add an agent via a register(registry) hook — not by editing _create_agent or the AgentKind enum (models/enums.py, which lists only the known built-in kinds)
    • coder_eval/orchestration/ — Batch execution, experiment resolution, and the single declarative merge resolver (config_merge.py::resolve_root)
    • coder_eval/cli/ — Typer + Rich CLI commands; generic -D/--set overrides (orchestration/overrides.py)
    • coder_eval/streaming/ — Real-time agent event streaming; the agent is the sole emitter and EventCollector is the single TurnRecord capture seam
    • tests/lint/rules/ — custom architectural lint rules (CE001–CExxx), the project's harness for mechanically-enforced invariants

Read the full file on GitHub · 219 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 219 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 8a00196fd548

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coder-eval-create-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository UiPath/coder_eval (119 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 4,320 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.