Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ultra-ai-dle/frogger. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ultra-ai-dle/frogger/develop/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ultra-ai-dle/froggerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ultra-ai-dle/frogger/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ultra-ai-dle/frogger/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ultra-ai-dle/frogger/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ultra-ai-dle/frogger/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ultra-ai-dle/frogger/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00421 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review — Feature + 테스트 코드 품질 검사 + 커밋
목적
지정된 feature의 소스 코드와 테스트 코드를 품질 관점에서 검사하고, 개선 사항을 적용하여 커밋한다.
입력
$ARGUMENTS— 검사 대상 feature 경로 또는 이름 (예:execution/runtime,store/useProvaStore)
실행 절차
- 대상 파일 수집: feature 소스 파일 + 관련 테스트 파일을 모두 읽는다.
- 품질 검사 항목:
- 타입 안전성:
any사용, 타입 단언(as) 남용, 누락된 타입 정의 - 에러 핸들링: try-catch 누락, 에러 무시(
catch(e) {}), 에러 타입 미지정 - 코드 구조: 함수 길이 (50줄 초과 경고), 중복 로직, 불필요한 의존성
- 네이밍: 의미 불명확한 변수명, 일관성 없는 네이밍 컨벤션
- 테스트 품질: assertion 없는 테스트, 테스트 설명과 실제 검증 불일치, 커버리지 부족 영역
- 타입 안전성:
- 개선 적용: 발견된 이슈를 수정한다. 단, 동작 변경 없이 품질만 개선한다.
- 검증: type check(
npx tsc --noEmit)를 실행하여 깨진 것이 없는지 확인한다. - 커밋:
refactor: [feature명] 코드 품질 개선형식으로 커밋한다.
주의사항
- 기능 변경은 하지 않는다. 리팩토링 범위만 다룬다.
- 개선 사항이 없으면 커밋하지 않고 "이슈 없음" 으로 보고한다.
- 테스트가 없는 feature는
/test를 먼저 실행할 것을 권장한다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d22faca7d430
review is a command published in the GitHub repository ultra-ai-dle/frogger (8 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 421 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
audio-pass
Functional audio review for implementation, mix coverage, clarity, and player feedback.
test-value-review
Use when a diff adds or changes test files, when a PR claims coverage for config, CI workflows, templates, or HTML output, or when tests look written only to satisfy a "must have tests" rule; not for Playwright selector or performance hygiene (use /playwright-review).
bug-check
Run automated tests and build checks first, then agent code review. For each bug found, propose or document a regression test.
claude-loop
Use a fresh headless Claude session (Fable by default) as an independent reviewer of the whole repo, area by area (or of one branch's diff with --base), fix every real finding with regression tests, and loop until each area comes back clean twice in a row. The /codex-loop pattern on Anthropic usage. Runs autonomously.
security-sast
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for code vulnerability analysis across multiple languages and frameworks.