opsx-apply

opsx-apply is a command for coding agents from unbound-force/gaze. It costs 10 tokens per session (1,279 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A command for implementing tasks described in an OpenSpec change, a structured list of planned software changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to select an OpenSpec change, verify the branch, retrieve related implementation context, and carry out its tasks.
Why use it?
It helps connect an approved change description to the code work while checking that the correct change and Git branch are selected.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/unbound-force/gaze/opsx-apply
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unbound-force/gaze

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for opsx-apply

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unbound-force/gaze/opsx-apply.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/opsx-apply)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/opsx-apply"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unbound-force/gaze/opsx-apply.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,279 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.01279
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00639
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00256
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00128

Measured 3d ago against content hash 08a0c57933b5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

opsx-apply scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.opencode/commands/opsx-apply.md · 176 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.

Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx-apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select

    Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., /opsx-apply <other>).

1a. Validate branch

Run git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD to get the current branch.

  • If the current branch is opsx/<change-name>: proceed.
  • If the current branch is NOT opsx/<change-name>: STOP with error:

    "Must be on branch opsx/<change-name> to implement this change. Run: git checkout opsx/<change-name>"

1b. Retrieve implementation context from Dewey

Before implementing, query Dewey for relevant patterns:

  • dewey_semantic_search with the task description to find similar implementations in other repos
  • dewey_semantic_search_filtered with source_type: "web" to find relevant toolstack documentation
  • dewey_search for convention pack references related to the task's domain

Use the retrieved context to follow established patterns and avoid reinventing solutions that already exist in the ecosystem.

If Dewey is unavailable, proceed with direct file reads of convention packs and local code examples.

  1. Check status to understand the schema

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to understand:

    • schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
  2. Get apply instructions

    openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
    

    This returns:

    • Context file paths (varies by schema)
    • Progress (total, complete, remaining)
    • Task list with status
    • Dynamic instruction based on current state

    Handle states:

    • If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using /opsx-continue
    • If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
    • Otherwise: proceed to implementation
  3. Read context files

    Read the files listed in contextFiles from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:

    • spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
    • Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
  4. Show current progress

    Display:

    • Schema being used
    • Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • Remaining tasks overview
    • Dynamic instruction from CLI
  5. Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)

    For each pending task:

    • Show which task is being worked on
    • Make the code changes required
    • Keep changes minimal and focused
    • Mark task complete in the tasks file: - [ ]- [x]
    • Continue to next task

    Pause if:

    • Task is unclear → ask for clarification
    • Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
    • Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
    • User interrupts
  6. On completion or pause, show status

    Display:

    • Tasks completed this session
    • Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
    • If all done: suggest archive
    • If paused: explain why and wait for guidance

Output During Implementation

## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)

Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete

Output On Completion

## Implementation Complete

**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓

### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...

All tasks complete! You can archive this change with `/opsx-archive`.

Read the full file on GitHub · 176 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 176 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 08a0c57933b5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

opsx-apply is a command published in the GitHub repository unbound-force/gaze (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,279 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.