Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to unbound-force/gaze. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/unbound-force/gaze/main/.opencode/commands/uf.review-council.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unbound-force/gazeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-council)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-council/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-council.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.09241 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.04620 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01848 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00924 |
Grade A, and why
uf.review-council scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 936 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command: /uf.review-council
Session-resume guard: If this session was resumed from compressed context, re-read this entire template before continuing. Do NOT infer step completion from compressed summaries. Check the EXECUTION CHECKLIST below for actual completion state. If the checklist shows unchecked items, resume from the first unchecked item. When in doubt, re-read — false re-reads are harmless; skipping steps due to stale context causes incomplete reviews or unauthorized actions.
EXECUTION CHECKLIST — Update each item using the Edit tool as you complete it. Mark
[x]when done.
- Phase 1a: Pre-flight checks
- Phase 1b: Gaze quality analysis
- Phase 1c: Review context discovery
- Step 2: Divisor agent delegation (full branch diff)
- Step 3: Finding consolidation
- Step 4: Fix loop (iteration: _/3)
- Step 5: Iteration limit check
- Step 6: Final report
- Step 7a: PR detection
- Step 7b: Review state fetching
- Step 7c: Pre-posting checks
- Step 7d: Finding aggregation
- Step 7e: Inline comment preparation
- Step 7f: Human confirmation (MANDATORY GATE)
- Step 7g: Post review
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Description
Review the current codebase or SpecKit artifacts for compliance with the Behavioral Constraints in AGENTS.md using the review council. The council dynamically discovers which reviewer agents are available rather than assuming a fixed set.
Determine Review Mode
The review mode is determined automatically by examining the workspace state. The user can also force a mode explicitly.
Explicit Override
If $ARGUMENTS contains the word "specs", use
Spec Review Mode regardless of auto-detection.
If $ARGUMENTS contains the word "code", use
Code Review Mode regardless of auto-detection.
PR Number Argument
After removing mode keywords ("specs", "code") from
$ARGUMENTS, check if the remaining text contains a
positive integer. If so, validate it:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +60 lines f3c7bfa4f536
- 10d ago First seen · 876 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 7c2e3a1b081d
uf.review-council is a command published in the GitHub repository unbound-force/gaze (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 9,241 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.