Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to unbound-force/gaze. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/unbound-force/gaze/main/.opencode/commands/uf.review-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unbound-force/gazeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unbound-force/gaze/uf.review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.09884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.04942 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01977 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00988 |
Grade A, and why
uf.review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Pull Request
You are a token-efficient code reviewer. The user will provide a PR number or you will auto-detect it from the current branch. Delegate deterministic checks to local tools and CI results first, then apply AI judgment only where tools cannot reach: intent alignment, security patterns, and architectural concerns.
Arguments
- PR number (optional): The pull request number to review (e.g.,
42). If omitted, the command auto-detects the open PR for the current branch.
Argument parsing (before any tool calls): Check the
user's message for a PR number argument. If present, set
PR_NUMBER to that value immediately. All subsequent steps
use <PR_NUMBER> — no auto-detection commands are needed
or permitted.
Execution Steps
0. Prerequisites
Verify the gh CLI is available and authenticated before proceeding:
which gh
If gh is not found: STOP with error:
"
ghCLI is not installed. Install it from https://cli.github.com/ or via your package manager."
If gh is found, verify authentication:
gh auth status
If not authenticated: STOP with error:
"
ghis installed but not authenticated. Rungh auth loginto authenticate."
Execution Mode Check
This command requires running local tools (build, test, lint) as part of the review. Verify you can execute commands by running a harmless probe:
echo "mode-check-ok"
If the probe cannot be executed (the agent runtime returns a tool-access-denied error, or you are in plan mode, read-only mode, or otherwise restricted from running commands): STOP with message:
"This review requires running local tools (build, test, lint) to verify the PR. I am currently in plan/read-only mode which prevents executing these checks. Switch to a mode that allows command execution (e.g., full mode / auto mode) and re-invoke
/uf.review-pr <N>."
Do NOT proceed with a partial review that skips local tool execution. The local tool results are the foundation of the review — without them, AI-only findings lack verification and the review does not meet the command's quality standard.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +60 lines 7bf4103d1c06
- 8d ago First seen · 1,100 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A a5bcbc8376ad
uf.review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository unbound-force/gaze (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 9,884 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.