Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/competitive-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/competitive-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/competitive-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/competitive-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00759 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competitive-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/competitive-analysis -- Competitive Landscape Analysis
Research and analyze your competitive landscape. Identifies direct and indirect competitors, maps positioning, and surfaces differentiation opportunities.
Invocation
/competitive-analysis AI-powered project management tools
/competitive-analysis Our product vs Notion, Asana, and Monday.com
/competitive-analysis [upload a competitor list or market brief]
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Competitive Context
Ask:
- What is your product? What category does it compete in?
- Any specific competitors you want analyzed? Or should I identify them?
- What's the lens? (feature comparison, positioning, pricing, go-to-market)
- What will you use this analysis for? (strategy, sales enablement, investor pitch, product roadmap)
Step 2: Identify Competitors
Apply the competitor-analysis skill:
- Identify 5 direct competitors (same category, same buyer)
- Identify 2-3 indirect competitors (different approach, same job-to-be-done)
- Note emerging/disruptive players if relevant
- Use web research to gather current information
Step 3: Analyze Each Competitor
For each competitor:
- Positioning: How they describe themselves, target audience, key messaging
- Strengths: What they do well, where they win
- Weaknesses: Where they fall short, common complaints
- Pricing: Model and price points (if public)
- Market traction: Funding, team size, customer base signals
- Recent moves: New features, partnerships, pivots
Step 4: Generate Competitive Analysis
## Competitive Analysis: [Your Product/Market]
**Date**: [today]
**Analyzed**: [count] competitors
### Market Overview
[2-3 sentences on market dynamics, trends, and where it's heading]
### Competitive Landscape
| Competitor | Category | Target | Positioning | Strength | Weakness |
|-----------|----------|--------|------------|----------|----------|
### Feature Comparison Matrix
| Capability | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B | Competitor C |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
### Positioning Map
[2x2 matrix showing competitive positioning on key dimensions]
### Differentiation Opportunities
1. **[Opportunity]** — [why it's defensible and valuable]
2. ...
### Competitive Threats
1. **[Threat]** — [what to watch for, recommended response]
2. ...
### Recommendations
- **Double down on**: [your unique advantages]
- **Close the gap on**: [table-stakes features you're missing]
- **Ignore**: [competitor moves that aren't worth responding to]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 115f596c5774
competitive-analysis is a command published in the GitHub repository unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 759 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competitive-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
competitive-analysis compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| competitive-analysisunixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills | Command | 2 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |