Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowthWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-copy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-copy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-copy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-copy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00657 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
gtm-copy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 31 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/gtm-copy - Copy that SUCKS (in the good way): Specific, Useful, Clear, Kept simple, Structured
This command applies the drew-sucks-framework skill. It respects userConfig.output_language (IT default), userConfig.industry, userConfig.brand_voice and, if the format is not specified, userConfig.default_channel.
Steps
-
Load the skill. Invoke the
drew-sucks-frameworkskill by name (it activates from its description; do not use file paths): use the cheatsheet for the pre-publication run-through and dig into patterns and chapters (proof, curiosity, structure) when needed. Do NOT summarize the theory to the user: apply it. -
Frame the input. From
$ARGUMENTSderive the requested format (email / landing / post) and the brief. If the format is missing, infer it from the brief; failing that, mapuserConfig.default_channel(email→email, instagram→post, seo→landing;auto→infer from context). Identify One True Fan, one problem, one solution (Rule of One) grounded in theindustry. -
Apply SUCKS to
$ARGUMENTS:- S — Specific: Rule of One + non-round numbers and concrete industry details.
- U — Useful / Unique / Undeniable: clear payoff for the reader-hero, "How-I" angle + named mechanism, and Persuasion Proof Stack (association → your results → client results).
- C — Clear / Curious / Conversational: clean sentences, the 4 curiosity triggers in the hooks, tone in the
brand_voice("would I say it in person?"). - K — Kept simple: small words, rule of 1/3, low readability.
- S — Structured: skimmable formatting and a slippery slope toward the CTA.
-
Produce the final copy already in the requested format:
- email: subject + 2-3 hook variants, body, CTA.
- landing: hero (headline + sub), sections with subheadings, proof, CTA.
- post: hook, skimmable development, closing/CTA for the channel.
-
Close with the SUCKS checklist (S/U/C/K/S checked off) and 1-2 notes on what to strengthen if the user provides more proof or data.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 31 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1cdfe200d34d
gtm-copy is a command published in the GitHub repository uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 657 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
recall-save
Generate / overwrite .recall/context.md with Recall's local offline summarizer.
notebook-query
Query the notebook knowledge base (SQLite) built by /agy:notebook — precise, grounded, cited. Ask in natural language ("sum the amounts by category", "which docs mention 'Acme Corp'", "build a project timeline") or pass raw SQL. Read-only. Use this when you need exact aggregates/lookups across a document corpus…
ccc-orchestrate
Sequential and tmux/worktree orchestration guidance for multi-agent workflows.
standup
Show a daily standup summary with completed, in-progress, and blocked tasks across all active epics.
audit-project-github
This file contains GitHub integration for /audit-project.
design
A command that turns an existing plan into a detailed technical design for building the feature.