Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowthWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-email)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-email"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-email/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-email"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth/gtm-email.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00562 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00281 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
gtm-email scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 30 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/gtm-email - Email automation workflow
This command applies the advanced-email-marketing skill.
Always respect userConfig.output_language (IT default), userConfig.industry, userConfig.brand_voice and userConfig.default_channel.
Steps
-
Load the skill. Invoke the
advanced-email-marketingskill by name (it activates from its description; do not use file paths) and apply its frameworks, going deeper with cheatsheets, patterns and the relevant chapter (RFM, advanced segments, specific flow) when needed. Do NOT copy the books' content: use it only to reason. -
Frame the input. Analyze
$ARGUMENTSand theindustryto understand the scenario (lead-gen vs e-commerce), the goal of the flow and the audience. If essential data is missing (product cycle, desired length, exclusions), ask 1-2 targeted questions before proceeding. -
Apply the frameworks. Work in the order of the workflow grammar: start from the customer journey and choose the correct activation trigger among the 8 triggers. Define the segment (via RFM segmentation for e-commerce or scoring for lead-gen) and the excluded ones. Set delays, if/then and branching. Model the right flow among welcome / drip / abandoned cart / winback (and its related Sunset). Verify deliverability, GDPR compliance and plan at least one A/B test on subject or timing.
-
Produce the structured output in the
brand_voice:- Goal + KPI (and who to EXCLUDE)
- Segment (definition + size check)
- Trigger / Enrollment (exact condition with AND/OR/NOT, one-time entry or always-on)
- Email sequence: for each -> delay, if/then branch, subject + preview text, content angle, CTA
- Operational notes: deliverability, GDPR/consent, dynamic vs static coupon, planned A/B test
Close with the skill's pre-launch checklist as a final check before activation.
Red-team (optional). Invoke the
gtm-criticagent to stress-test the flow (offer↔email message consistency, frictions and exit points, deliverability/GDPR, correct trigger), then integrate the fixes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 30 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A bc851d6b94ce
gtm-email is a command published in the GitHub repository uppifyagency/bettercallclaudegrowth (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 562 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
recall-save
Generate / overwrite .recall/context.md with Recall's local offline summarizer.
notebook-query
Query the notebook knowledge base (SQLite) built by /agy:notebook — precise, grounded, cited. Ask in natural language ("sum the amounts by category", "which docs mention 'Acme Corp'", "build a project timeline") or pass raw SQL. Read-only. Use this when you need exact aggregates/lookups across a document corpus…
ccc-orchestrate
Sequential and tmux/worktree orchestration guidance for multi-agent workflows.
standup
Show a daily standup summary with completed, in-progress, and blocked tasks across all active epics.
audit-project-github
This file contains GitHub integration for /audit-project.
design
A command that turns an existing plan into a detailed technical design for building the feature.