Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-newgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/urav06/dialecticWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00730 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00365 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
debate-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create New Debate
Step 1: Motion
"What's your debate motion?
You can write it in any of these formats:
Formal styles:
This house believes that[proposition] — British ParliamentaryThis house would[action] — Policy debateResolved:[statement] — American Parliamentary
Or state it directly (we'll keep it as-is)
Your motion:"
Step 2: Slug
If $1 argument provided:
- Use
$1as the slug - Validate format (lowercase, numbers, hyphens only)
- Check it doesn't exist as a directory
- If valid: skip to Step 3
- If invalid format: explain requirements and ask for new slug
- If exists: list existing debates and ask for different name
If no argument provided:
-
After receiving motion, auto-generate 2-3 slug suggestions from motion keywords
-
Present: "Suggested slugs:
- [auto-generated-1]
- [auto-generated-2]
- [auto-generated-3]
Pick a number, or type your own (lowercase, hyphens only):"
-
Validate chosen/custom slug:
- Check format (lowercase, numbers, hyphens only)
- Check doesn't exist as a directory
- If format invalid: explain and ask again
- If exists: list existing debates and ask for different name
Step 3: Definitions & Scope (Optional)
"Optional refinements:
Type 'definitions' to define key terms, 'scope' to set debate focus, or 'skip' to continue:"
If user types 'definitions':
- Suggest 2-3 key terms from the motion that might need defining
- For each term: "Define '[term]':" (record definition)
If user types 'scope':
- Ask: "Specify the debate's scope or focus:"
- Record scope
If user types 'skip':
- Proceed to creation
Step 4: Create Debate
Once all information is gathered:
- Create directory:
{slug}/ - Create
{slug}/arguments/directory - Create
{slug}/debate.mdwith JSON frontmatter:
{
"debate_id": "{slug}",
"current_exchange": 0,
"current_phase": "awaiting_arguments",
"cumulative_scores": {
"proposition": {"total": 0, "count": 0},
"opposition": {"total": 0, "count": 0}
}
}
# Motion
{formalized motion}
## Definitions
{if any definitions were provided:}
- **{term}**: {definition}
## Scope
{scope if provided}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 54141757bf93
debate-new is a command published in the GitHub repository urav06/dialectic (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
convert-to-todowrite-tasklist-prompt
Purpose: Transform verbose, context-heavy slash commands into efficient TodoWrite tasklist-based methods with parallel subagent execution for 60-70% speed improvements.
cleanup-context
You are a memory bank optimization specialist tasked with reducing token usage in the project's documentation system while maintaining all essential information and improving organization.
batch-operations-prompt
Optimize prompts for multiple file operations, parallel processing, and efficient bulk changes across a codebase. This helps Claude Code work more efficiently with TodoWrite patterns.
convert-to-test-driven-prompt
Transform user requests into Test-Driven Development (TDD) style prompts that explicitly define expected outcomes, test cases, and success criteria before implementation.
check-best-practices
Analyze code against language-specific best practices, coding standards, and community conventions to improve code quality and maintainability.
security-audit
Perform a comprehensive security audit of the codebase to identify potential vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and security best practice violations.