debate-new

An interactive command for starting a new debate project. A debate is a structured discussion where different sides argue for or against a stated proposition.

In plain words
What is it for?
Entering a debate motion, suggesting or checking a lowercase hyphenated folder name, and ensuring that name is not already used.
Why use it?
It guides you through naming the debate and creates a valid project identifier, reducing setup mistakes.

Command for Claude Code

Part of the dialectic plugin — 1 skill, 3 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/urav06/dialectic

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dialectic, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 3 commands, 2 agents.

Per session 7 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 730 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00007 $0.00730
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00365
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00073

Measured 3d ago against content hash 54141757bf93, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

debate-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/debate-new.md · 112 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Create New Debate

Step 1: Motion

"What's your debate motion?

You can write it in any of these formats:

Formal styles:

  • This house believes that [proposition] — British Parliamentary
  • This house would [action] — Policy debate
  • Resolved: [statement] — American Parliamentary

Or state it directly (we'll keep it as-is)

Your motion:"

Step 2: Slug

If $1 argument provided:

  1. Use $1 as the slug
  2. Validate format (lowercase, numbers, hyphens only)
  3. Check it doesn't exist as a directory
  4. If valid: skip to Step 3
  5. If invalid format: explain requirements and ask for new slug
  6. If exists: list existing debates and ask for different name

If no argument provided:

  1. After receiving motion, auto-generate 2-3 slug suggestions from motion keywords

  2. Present: "Suggested slugs:

    1. [auto-generated-1]
    2. [auto-generated-2]
    3. [auto-generated-3]

    Pick a number, or type your own (lowercase, hyphens only):"

  3. Validate chosen/custom slug:

    • Check format (lowercase, numbers, hyphens only)
    • Check doesn't exist as a directory
    • If format invalid: explain and ask again
    • If exists: list existing debates and ask for different name

Step 3: Definitions & Scope (Optional)

"Optional refinements:

Type 'definitions' to define key terms, 'scope' to set debate focus, or 'skip' to continue:"

If user types 'definitions':

  • Suggest 2-3 key terms from the motion that might need defining
  • For each term: "Define '[term]':" (record definition)

If user types 'scope':

  • Ask: "Specify the debate's scope or focus:"
  • Record scope

If user types 'skip':

  • Proceed to creation

Step 4: Create Debate

Once all information is gathered:

  1. Create directory: {slug}/
  2. Create {slug}/arguments/ directory
  3. Create {slug}/debate.md with JSON frontmatter:
{
  "debate_id": "{slug}",
  "current_exchange": 0,
  "current_phase": "awaiting_arguments",
  "cumulative_scores": {
    "proposition": {"total": 0, "count": 0},
    "opposition": {"total": 0, "count": 0}
  }
}

# Motion

{formalized motion}

## Definitions

{if any definitions were provided:}
- **{term}**: {definition}

## Scope

{scope if provided}

Read the full file on GitHub · 112 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 54141757bf93

Subscribe to this mod's changes

debate-new is a command published in the GitHub repository urav06/dialectic (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.