debate-new

debate-new is a command for Claude Code from urav06/dialectic. It costs 7 tokens per session (730 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An interactive command for starting a new debate project. A debate is a structured discussion where different sides argue for or against a stated proposition.

In plain words
What is it for?
Entering a debate motion, suggesting or checking a lowercase hyphenated folder name, and ensuring that name is not already used.
Why use it?
It guides you through naming the debate and creates a valid project identifier, reducing setup mistakes.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Part of the dialectic plugin — 1 skill, 3 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Entering a debate motion, suggesting or checking a lowercase hyphenated folder name, and ensuring that name is not already used.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/urav06/dialectic

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dialectic, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 3 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for debate-new

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for debate-new

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/urav06/dialectic/debate-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 7 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 730 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00007 $0.00730
Opus 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00292
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00001 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00073

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 54141757bf93, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

debate-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/debate-new.md · 112 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Create New Debate

Step 1: Motion

"What's your debate motion?

You can write it in any of these formats:

Formal styles:

  • This house believes that [proposition] — British Parliamentary
  • This house would [action] — Policy debate
  • Resolved: [statement] — American Parliamentary

Or state it directly (we'll keep it as-is)

Your motion:"

Step 2: Slug

If $1 argument provided:

  1. Use $1 as the slug
  2. Validate format (lowercase, numbers, hyphens only)
  3. Check it doesn't exist as a directory
  4. If valid: skip to Step 3
  5. If invalid format: explain requirements and ask for new slug
  6. If exists: list existing debates and ask for different name

If no argument provided:

  1. After receiving motion, auto-generate 2-3 slug suggestions from motion keywords

  2. Present: "Suggested slugs:

    1. [auto-generated-1]
    2. [auto-generated-2]
    3. [auto-generated-3]

    Pick a number, or type your own (lowercase, hyphens only):"

  3. Validate chosen/custom slug:

    • Check format (lowercase, numbers, hyphens only)
    • Check doesn't exist as a directory
    • If format invalid: explain and ask again
    • If exists: list existing debates and ask for different name

Step 3: Definitions & Scope (Optional)

"Optional refinements:

Type 'definitions' to define key terms, 'scope' to set debate focus, or 'skip' to continue:"

If user types 'definitions':

  • Suggest 2-3 key terms from the motion that might need defining
  • For each term: "Define '[term]':" (record definition)

If user types 'scope':

  • Ask: "Specify the debate's scope or focus:"
  • Record scope

If user types 'skip':

  • Proceed to creation

Step 4: Create Debate

Once all information is gathered:

  1. Create directory: {slug}/
  2. Create {slug}/arguments/ directory
  3. Create {slug}/debate.md with JSON frontmatter:
{
  "debate_id": "{slug}",
  "current_exchange": 0,
  "current_phase": "awaiting_arguments",
  "cumulative_scores": {
    "proposition": {"total": 0, "count": 0},
    "opposition": {"total": 0, "count": 0}
  }
}

# Motion

{formalized motion}

## Definitions

{if any definitions were provided:}
- **{term}**: {definition}

## Scope

{scope if provided}

Read the full file on GitHub · 112 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 54141757bf93

Subscribe to this mod's changes

debate-new is a command published in the GitHub repository urav06/dialectic (6 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other commands, from other repositories

differential-audit

Audit EARS↔code coherence via a bidirectional differential. With no arguments, opens a scoping conversation that interprets what the user wants audited, maps it to arrows, and captures an explicit EARS selection. With one or more EARS IDs, audits those specs directly using configured defaults. Requires docs/arrows/…

jszmajda/lid · 77 tokens

verify

A command that independently checks the factual claims and file-and-line references in an agent’s most recent response. It reports whether each claim is confirmed, outdated, missing, or unsupported.

skymanbp/cc-enforcer · 28 tokens

pm-agent-retire

Mark a great-pm agent as deprecated. Adds a deprecation banner to the agent file, files a Beads issue to remove dependent commands/workflows, and logs the rationale. NEVER deletes the file (history preserved).

VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm · 44 tokens

pm-audit

Run the great-pm PM-health audit on a product, an initiative, or great-pm itself. 15 dimensions, severity-rated findings, Top-5 + Quick-Wins + Things-Look-Bad-But-Fine + Open Questions. Files findings as Beads tasks unless --read-only.

VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm · 61 tokens

pm-crystallize

Promote a project-local lesson to /.great-pm/decisions.md (cross-project memory) when it has 3+ hits with high confidence. Surfaces candidates as PROPOSALS — never auto-promotes; human approval required.

VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm · 48 tokens

pm-promote

Promote a draft artefact (strategy / spec / launch plan / etc.) to a gate-ready Beads issue. Runs mandatory pm-reviewer pass first; PASS verdict is required to promote.

VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm · 39 tokens