Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Uri6407/claudegramWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/uri6407/claudegram/auth)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uri6407/claudegram/auth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uri6407/claudegram/auth/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/uri6407/claudegram/auth"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/uri6407/claudegram/auth.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00431 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00172 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
auth scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to auth — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Двухшаговый интерактивный логин в Telegram прямо из активной Claude-сессии.
Шаги:
- Запусти
mcp__plugin_claudegram_claudegram__health_check— если ужеauthorized: true, скажи юзеру и выйди. - Иначе вызови
auth_request_code()— Telegram пришлёт SMS-код на привязанный номер. Покажи юзеруphone(маскированный). - Спроси у юзера код через
AskUserQuestion(полеcode, 5 цифр). Если в userConfig не было пароля 2FA — спроси и его (опционально). - Вызови
auth_submit_code(code=<код>, password_2fa=<2fa или "">). - Если в ответе
needs_2fa: true— спроси пароль и повтори с ним. - Если в ответе
error: PhoneCodeInvalidError/Expired— предложи запросить новый код черезauth_request_code(). - После успеха вызови
health_check— должен показатьok=true,authorized=true,self_id. Скажи юзеру что готово.
Важно: НЕ предлагай ! claudegram-auth через Bash — он требует интерактивного
stdin, который Bash tool в Claude Code не предоставляет (commands/auth.md
устаревший подход). Используй ТОЛЬКО эти MCP-tools.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 5f89c4050512
auth is a command published in the GitHub repository Uri6407/claudegram (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 431 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to auth, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
workflow-classify
Classify task size (S/M/L/XL) and recommend the appropriate workflow pipeline.
security-audit
Comprehensive security audit of your project AND Claude Code configuration. Analyzes secrets exposure, injection surfaces, dependencies, hook security, and produces a scored security posture assessment.
init-docs
Fetch official Anthropic Claude Code docs and store as local baseline snapshot.
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.
verify
Run verification commands and confirm output before making success claims. Use before committing, creating PRs, or claiming work is complete. Evidence before assertions, ALWAYS.
todo.template
This prompt was authored for Claude-style slash workflows. In Codex runtime, adapt tool calls as follows.