Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to usurahi-project/usurahi. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/usurahi-project/usurahi/develop/.claude/commands/tutorial.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/usurahi-project/usurahiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/usurahi-project/usurahi/tutorial)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/usurahi-project/usurahi/tutorial"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/usurahi-project/usurahi/tutorial/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/usurahi-project/usurahi/tutorial"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/usurahi-project/usurahi/tutorial.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00257 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
tutorial scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/tutorial
薄氷を初めて使う人に、3分で全体像を案内する。
すること
docs/tutorial.mdを読む- その内容を、初見向けに短く説明する
- 最後に次の操作を案内する
案内する要点
- 薄氷は、部活として依頼を受けて結論を返す仕組み
- 入口は
./usurahi.sh - 部室は
./usurahi.sh clubroom ● 名前は会話のボール保持者- 掲示板はメモ、図書館はナレッジ保存
- ユーザーは途中判断と最後の採用を担当する
出力方針
- 長く説明しない
- 初回に覚えるコマンドは
./usurahi.shに絞る - 安全に試すなら
./usurahi.sh start --setupを案内する - 詳細を知りたい人には
docs/tutorial.mdを案内する
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 03eda0b5b897
tutorial is a command published in the GitHub repository usurahi-project/usurahi (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed ISC. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 257 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
explain
Provide clear explanations of code, concepts, and system behavior with educational clarity.
training-coach-trainer
Train-the-trainer (TtT) protocol for internal subject-matter-experts who will deliver a training program. Condensed adult-learning principles, facilitation skills, common SME-as-trainer failure modes, cohort facilitation practice schedule, and a TtT-readiness rubric. Refuses SME deployment without TtT.
training-measure-transfer
Kirkpatrick L3 (behavior) + L4 (results) measurement plan for a training program. Behavior observation protocol with sampling cadence, business-metric tracking, post-program reinforcement plan, redesign feedback loop. Refuses L1-only smile-sheet evaluation; refuses programs without baseline.
training-curriculum
Outcome-back curriculum design for a single program or module. Starts from the L3 job behavior change and L4 business outcome; works backward through capability requirements, sequencing, spaced retrieval, cognitive-load chunking, encoding-context simulation, and per-module evaluation rubric. Refuses content-first…
training-scenarios
Scenario / case library design for a skill domain — 10-15 scenarios across difficulty range with setup, decision points, response rubric, and debrief discussion guide. Format mirrors the structured-interview rubric pattern from the Hiring sub-system. Scenarios are the bridge from concept to on-job behavior; without…
library-research
Enrich a book entry with curated "Continue Reading" recommendations and "Go Deeper" videos. Final step in the Library OS deepen workflow.