Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-competitive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-competitive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-competitive/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-competitive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-competitive.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00738 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
pm-competitive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the great-pm /pm-competitive command. Build a competitive view.
Parse arguments
<competitor-name | jtbd-slug>(required) → either a single competitor or a JTBD slug (in which case the agent enumerates the landscape).--depth=(default:quick).quick— public surface (site, docs, pricing page, recent announcements).deep— quick + user reviews + g2/capterra + estimated funnel + inferred metric movements.
Pre-flight
TARGET="${1:?usage: /pm-competitive <competitor-or-jtbd> [--depth=...]}"
mkdir -p .great-pm/drafts
Operating procedure
-
Step 0 — refine the user's query (transparent Mode B). Invoke
query-refiner-pmwith$ARGUMENTS. The refiner returns:You typed: <original> Refined to: <refined brief> What changed: <one line> Proceeding with refined. Reply "use original" to override.Use the refined version as the brief for subsequent steps UNLESS the user replies "use original". Log the refinement to
.great-pm/refinements/$(date +%Y-%m-%d).log. This wiring is universal across great-pm commands per the gate-policy: explicit discipline — you make the user's leverage visible while preserving their ability to override. -
market-analyst
- Brief: per target, gather:
- Positioning statement (theirs, in their words).
- Pricing model + tier shape.
- Core JTBD covered + where they fall short.
- Recent moves (last 90 days — launches, partnerships, pricing changes).
- Gaps we can exploit (this is the punchline).
- Things they do better than we do (the honesty section).
- If JTBD-slug, enumerate the top 3–5 competitors and apply the above per competitor, plus a comparison table at the end.
- Output:
.great-pm/drafts/competitive-brief-<target-slug>.mdusingtemplates/COMPETITIVE-BRIEF-template.md.
- Brief: per target, gather:
-
Surface the 3 positioning gaps we should consider as the one-screen summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 76 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 8a05b9391291
pm-competitive is a command published in the GitHub repository VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
CLAUDE
Multi-agent collaboration platform for persistent, proactive AI agents across rooms, workspaces, skills, and external services.
discover
Run a full product discovery cycle — from outcome definition through opportunity mapping, prioritisation, and experiment design. Use when the team isn't sure what to build next, or before writing a PRD for a complex feature space.
coding-audit
Medical-coding / revenue-cycle compliance audit. Invokes rcm-reviewer to assess autonomous ICD-10-CM / CPT / HCPCS coding for False Claims Act exposure (upcoding/unbundling), NCCI edits + MUEs, medical necessity (LCD/NCD), modifier discipline, HIPAA minimum-necessary — and force a certified-coder (CPC/CCS) sign-off.
tax-review
Tax-filing compliance check — invokes tax-reviewer to produce TM-tax-{slug}.md with MeF e-file schema, Form 8879, PTIN/Circular 230, and IRC §7216 consent gaps.
doctor
Use when the user invokes /goal-flight doctor to check Goal Flight host and project readiness.
help
Quick reference for all Attune commands.