Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/mockgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collectiveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/mock)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/mock"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective/mock.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00389 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00195 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
mock scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/mock - Mock Agent Testing Command
allowed-tools: Task(*) description: 🧪 Test agent handoff coordination using ONLY mock agents - complete isolation from real agents
Purpose
Test complete agent handoff chains using ONLY mock agents. This command routes exclusively to mock agents to validate coordination patterns without touching any real implementation agents.
Mock Agent Routing
Mock Chain Flow
/mock → mock-prd-research-agent → mock-project-manager-agent → mock-implementation-agent → mock-testing-agent → mock-quality-gate-agent → mock-completion-agent
Available Mock Agents ONLY
mock-prd-research-agent- Mock PRD analysismock-project-manager-agent- Mock project coordinationmock-implementation-agent- Mock development simulationmock-testing-agent- Mock testing simulationmock-quality-gate-agent- Mock quality validationmock-completion-agent- Mock delivery simulation
Execution
For ANY mock testing request, route to mock-prd-research-agent:
Task(subagent_type="mock-prd-research-agent",
description="Mock chain testing",
prompt="Start complete mock agent handoff chain simulation using mock PRD at .taskmaster/docs/mock-prd.txt - test all handoff patterns through mock-project-manager-agent → mock-implementation-agent → mock-testing-agent → mock-quality-gate-agent → mock-completion-agent")
Usage Examples
/mock "test handoff chain"/mock "validate agent coordination"/mock "test complete workflow"
Critical Rules
- NEVER route to real agents (prd-research-agent, component-implementation-agent, etc.)
- ALWAYS start with mock-prd-research-agent
- ONLY test coordination patterns, no real implementation
- Use mock PRD at .taskmaster/docs/mock-prd.txt
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 45 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A eb70337d3974
mock is a command published in the GitHub repository vanzan01/claude-code-sub-agent-collective (521 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 389 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
assess
Assesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use…
brainstorm
Design exploration using parallel agents through a 7-phase process: topic analysis, memory context, divergent ideation (10+ ideas), feasibility filtering, evaluation with devil's advocate scoring (0-10 across 7 dimensions), synthesis of top approaches, and trade-off comparison. Supports open exploration, constrained…
fix-issue
Fixes GitHub issues using parallel analysis agents for root cause investigation, code exploration, and regression detection. Reads issue context from gh CLI, searches codebase and memory for related patterns, generates a fix with tests, and links the resolution back to the issue via PR. Includes prevention analysis to…
implement
Full-power feature implementation using parallel subagents for backend, frontend, testing, and security, with worktree isolation and quality verification in one workflow. Chains with /ork:cover for tests and /ork:verify for validation. Use when asked to build, add, create, scaffold, or set up a new feature, endpoint…
review-pr
PR review using parallel specialized agents for code quality, security, testing, architecture, and performance analysis. Synthesizes findings into a review report with conventional comments (praise/issue/suggestion/nitpick) and approve or request-changes verdict. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting security…
verify
Grade work that already exists and decide whether it can merge. Runs the project's current unit, integration, and E2E suites plus security scanning and type checking, scores every dimension 0-10, and returns a merge verdict with a VERIFIED-vs-CLAIMED evidence manifest. Writes no test files and edits no source. Use…