Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/audit — Control Testing
Execute framework-specific control tests against scoped systems.
Prerequisites
- Completed
/scopeartifact with approver sign-off - Primary skill selected from routing table (see
AGENTS.md)
Instructions
- Confirm scope — restate in-scope systems and frameworks.
- Load primary skill — follow its Core Process exactly.
- Execute tests — use MCP tools only if authorized in scope.
- Record findings — severity, control ID, observation, evidence refs.
- Do not claim compliance — report pass/fail/not-tested per control.
MCP audit mode
Run hooks/audit-mode.sh or set COMPLIANCE_AUDIT_MODE=true for read-only tool enforcement.
Output
- Findings list (YAML or JSON)
- Updated control matrix (
templates/compliance-control-matrix.yaml) - Test notes with UTC timestamps and tester identity
Framework skills
| Framework | Skills |
|---|---|
| HIPAA | hipaa-technical-safeguards, hipaa-phi-redaction-pipeline, hipaa-privacy-minimum-necessary |
| PCI-DSS | pci-dss-script-audit, pci-dss-network-segmentation, pci-dss-encryption-key-management |
| SOC 2 | soc2-trust-services-criteria, soc2-evidence-collection, soc2-ccm-continuous-monitoring |
| ISO 27001 | iso27001-annex-a-controls |
| NIST CSF 2.0 | nist-csf-2-assessment |
| CCPA / CPRA | ccpa-cpra-privacy-rights |
| FedRAMP | fedramp-moderate-baseline |
| SOX | sox-itgc-audit |
| CMMC | cmmc-nist-800-171 |
| GLBA / FFIEC | glba-ffiec-financial-privacy |
| HITECH breach | hitech-breach-notification |
| US state privacy | us-state-privacy-laws |
| COPPA / under-13 | coppa-children-privacy |
| NIST AI RMF | nist-ai-rmf-governance |
| FERPA / EdTech | ferpa-education-records |
Next command
Proceed to /evidence to collect proof artifacts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 51 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c78f689d8144
audit is a command published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 525 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
soa-generator
Generate ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability (SOA) with control selection justifications.
ssp-section-generate
Generate System Security Plan (SSP) sections for NIST 800-53 controls.
generate-tsc-matrix
Generate Trust Service Criteria implementation matrix.
service-auditor-prep
Generate complete auditor-ready evidence package for SOC 2.
testing-plan
Digital operational resilience testing requirements and planning under DORA.
continuous-monitoring-setup
Set up NIST 800-53 continuous monitoring per RA-5, SI-4, and CA-7.