Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skillsnpx agentmods add commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/reportWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00437 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00218 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/report — Findings Report
Produce executive and technical compliance reports.
Prerequisites
- Scope artifact (
/scope) - Audit findings (
/audit) - Evidence manifest (
/evidence) - Remediation plan (
/remediate) if gaps exist
Report structure
1. Executive summary (≤1 page)
- Engagement ID, period, frameworks
- Overall posture: not assessed / gaps identified / controls operating effectively (never "certified compliant")
- Top 3–5 risks by severity
- Remediation timeline summary
2. Scope recap
- In-scope / out-of-scope systems
- Data classifications
- Limitations and dependencies
3. Findings detail
| ID | Severity | Control | Observation | Recommendation | Status |
|---|
4. Evidence index
Reference audit-evidence-manifest.yaml artifact IDs — do not embed raw evidence in report body.
5. Remediation tracker
Summary table from /remediate output.
6. Appendices
- Control matrix excerpt
- Methodology (skills used, MCP tools, sampling approach)
Structured output (recommended)
- Copy
templates/reports/regulatory-findings-report.yamlto your engagement folder. - Populate from scope, audit, evidence, and remediate artifacts.
- Generate Markdown:
python scripts/generate-regulatory-report.py engagement/findings-input.yaml -o engagement/findings-report.md
See docs/regulatory-reports.md and examples/regulatory-reports/ for framework samples (HIPAA, PCI, SOC 2, NIST AI RMF, FERPA/COPPA).
Rules
- No raw PHI/PAN in report text
- Cite control IDs (HIPAA §, PCI Req, TSC CC)
- Include disclaimer: not legal advice; not attestation
Distribution
Classify as Confidential. Use secure channel for external auditors.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 66 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dddb22ee8d10
report is a command published in the GitHub repository vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 437 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
soa-generator
Generate ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability (SOA) with control selection justifications.
ssp-section-generate
Generate System Security Plan (SSP) sections for NIST 800-53 controls.
generate-tsc-matrix
Generate Trust Service Criteria implementation matrix.
service-auditor-prep
Generate complete auditor-ready evidence package for SOC 2.
testing-plan
Digital operational resilience testing requirements and planning under DORA.
continuous-monitoring-setup
Set up NIST 800-53 continuous monitoring per RA-5, SI-4, and CA-7.