Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/varienos/agentic-workflownpx agentmods add commands/varienos/agentic-workflow/task-plan.skeletonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/varienos/agentic-workflow/task-plan.skeleton)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/varienos/agentic-workflow/task-plan.skeleton"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/varienos/agentic-workflow/task-plan.skeleton/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/varienos/agentic-workflow/task-plan.skeleton"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/varienos/agentic-workflow/task-plan.skeleton.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.04410 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01764 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00882 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00441 |
Grade A, and why
task-plan.skeleton scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 463 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Plan — High-Level Task Creator
Analyzes the codebase deeply to create high-quality tasks. Usage:
/task-plan <request>,/task-plan "login page remember me add"
ULTRATHINK MODE — This command works with maximum comprehension depth.
- TAKE YOUR TIME. Think before acting.
- Superficial analysis IS PROHIBITED. Verify assumptions and consider alternatives.
- If something appears "obvious", prove why it's obvious.
- If the first solution that comes to mind is likely incomplete, think of at least three alternative solutions.
- This command should be executed with the OPUS model. Using Sonnet for task-plan execution IS PROHIBITED.
HARD GATE — Post-create /task-plan-review
This command creates the task. It does not finish the plan.
| Not enough | Required |
|---|---|
| Self-review, then the user report | Step 6 runs /task-plan-review on every new task |
| "Self-review is enough" | Notes contain [TASK_PLAN_REVIEW] and an overall result |
| User report before Step 6 | Read and follow the task-plan-review command body first |
Self-review does not score the planner. The scorecard is written only by /task-plan-review, and only in the user report. If Step 6 was skipped, do not tell the user the plan is ready.
Step 0 — Ultrathink: Deep Comprehension Phase
This phase IS MANDATORY. It cannot be skipped. The result will not be shown to the user, but it will guide subsequent steps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +15 lines scan C → A 307e5fbb8521
- 2mo ago First seen · 448 lines · 0 tokens per session scan C b77e0387b36e
task-plan.skeleton is a command published in the GitHub repository varienos/agentic-workflow (59 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,410 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
task-plan.skeleton compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| task-plan.skeletonvarienos/agentic-workflow | Command | 59 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| review-pryonatangross/orchestkit | Command | 299 | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Cursor |
| review-artifact-commentsyonatangross/orchestkit | Command | 299 | today | MIT | A | 45 | Claude Code, Cursor |
| gh-security-reviewsynaptiai/synapti-marketplace | Command | 7 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| review-decidegosha70/code-copilot-team | Command | 7 | yesterday | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| feolehsvyrydov/AI-development-team | Command | 19 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| archolehsvyrydov/AI-development-team | Command | 19 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 15 | Claude Code |