Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinnie357/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vinnie357/claude-skills/council)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vinnie357/claude-skills/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vinnie357/claude-skills/council/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vinnie357/claude-skills/council"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vinnie357/claude-skills/council.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01079 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
council scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run altana council to fan out one task to N harnesses simultaneously, then synthesize the array of responses into a structured analysis. Two modes are available: one-shot (default) and interactive (persistent-session, multi-round deliberation).
What it does:
- Invokes
altana council "<task>" [--harnesses <list>] [--rounds N] [--interactive] [--prompt <template>]. - Runs in the background (council calls are inherently parallel and may take time).
- Receives a JSON array of result objects — one per harness, in config-declaration order.
- In one-shot mode each element has a single
responsestring. - In interactive mode each element carries a
roundsarray of{round, response}objects instead of a singleresponse.
- In one-shot mode each element has a single
- Synthesizes the responses into a structured report:
- Agreements — claims all harnesses converge on.
- Disagreements — points where harnesses diverge; note which harness said what.
- Unique insights — observations raised by only one harness.
- Recommendation — a synthesized conclusion weighing all perspectives.
Why council? Different harnesses run different models or executors. The same question delegated to multiple independent agents surfaces blind spots, validates conclusions, and reveals model-specific biases. The synthesis step is where the value lands — raw JSON alone does not exploit the diverse perspectives.
Arguments:
<task>— the prompt to fan out. Council is read-only;--writepresets are rejected by altana.--harnesses a,b,c— comma-separated list of harness names; defaults to all configured harnesses when omitted.--rounds N— number of deliberation rounds when--interactiveis set; default 2.--interactive— opens one persistent session per harness; from round 2 on each harness sees labeled digests of its peers' prior-round answers and can react. Synthesis remains the caller's responsibility.--prompt <template>— optional named prompt template applied to each harness invocation.
Result array element fields (same schema as delegate):
| Field | Type |
|---|---|
harness |
string |
status |
done | timeout | crash | missing_sentinel |
duration_s |
float |
log_path |
string |
response |
string or null |
If altana is not installed:
Install altana (see its README — it is a Zig CLI built with zig 0.16). After building, place the binary on your PATH or invoke via mise exec -- zig-out/bin/altana.
Examples:
/council "what are the risks of removing the retry loop in src/client.zig?"
/council "critique the API surface in src/api.zig" --harnesses opus-harness,sonnet-harness
/council "review this design doc" --prompt design-review
/council "compare these two API designs" --interactive --rounds 1 --harnesses claude-cloud,claude-local
Task instructions:
Parse the argument: everything before the first -- flag is <task>; extract --harnesses, --rounds, --interactive, and --prompt from the flags. Flags must appear after the task string (the working invocation order is altana council "<task>" --flag value).
Run (in background): altana council "<task>" [--harnesses <list>] [--rounds N] [--interactive] [--prompt <template>]
Once the result arrives, parse the JSON array. For each element where status == "done", extract the ## Answer section from response. For non-done entries, note the harness name and failure status.
Synthesize across all done responses:
- Agreements — identify claims that appear (in substance) across all or most harnesses.
- Disagreements — identify points where harnesses give incompatible answers; attribute each position to its harness.
- Unique insights — note observations raised by exactly one harness that the others did not mention.
- Recommendation — produce a single synthesized answer that weighs the agreements, resolves or flags the disagreements, and incorporates the unique insights.
Report the synthesis. Append a table showing harness, status, and duration for transparency. If any harness returned non-done, note what was missing from the synthesis and point to the log_path for investigation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 72 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 76f5de319dfc
council is a command published in the GitHub repository vinnie357/claude-skills (25 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,079 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.