Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/main/.gemini/commands/planning.tomlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh/planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00157 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00078 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
description = "将工作拆解为带 acceptance criteria 和 dependency ordering 的小型可验证 tasks"
prompt = """ 调用 planning-and-task-breakdown skill。
阅读现有 spec（SPEC.md 或等效文件）以及相关 codebase 部分。然后：
- 进入 plan mode — 只读，不做代码变更
- 识别 components 之间的 dependency graph
- 垂直切分工作（每个 task 是一条完整路径，而不是水平分层）
- 编写带 acceptance criteria 和 verification steps 的 tasks
- 在 phases 之间添加 checkpoints
- 将 plan 提交给人类 review
将 plan 保存到 tasks/plan.md，将 task list 保存到 tasks/todo.md。 """
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 17 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 04d5f535aece
planning is a command published in the GitHub repository vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 157 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
ship
Run the pre-launch checklist via parallel fan-out to specialist personas, then synthesize a go/no-go decision.
plan
Break work into small verifiable tasks with acceptance criteria and dependency ordering.
build
Implement tasks incrementally — build, test, verify, commit. Add "auto" to run the whole plan in one approved pass.
webperf
Run a web performance audit via the web-performance-auditor persona.
code-simplify
Simplify code for clarity and maintainability — reduce complexity without changing behavior.
review
Conduct a five-axis code review — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance.