Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/viplee110/economics-paper-reviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/viplee110/economics-paper-reviewer/review-economics-paper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/viplee110/economics-paper-reviewer/review-economics-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/viplee110/economics-paper-reviewer/review-economics-paper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/viplee110/economics-paper-reviewer/review-economics-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/viplee110/economics-paper-reviewer/review-economics-paper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00140 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00070 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
review-economics-paper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Economics Paper
Review the current English economics paper using the economics-paper-reviewer protocol.
Steps:
- Read
CLAUDE.md. - Read
SKILL.md. - Load
references/review_pipeline.md,references/panel_protocol.md, andreferences/evidence_grounding.md. - Classify the paper type and load the matching lens files.
- If scores, benchmarking, validation, or human-reviewer comparison are requested, also load
references/benchmark_mode.mdandreferences/scorecard.md. - Produce the structured pre-review report using
references/report_template.md.
Do not claim final editorial authority. Mark missing evidence as provisional.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 15 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a97d457eab6f
review-economics-paper is a command published in the GitHub repository viplee110/economics-paper-reviewer (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 140 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
debrief
Capture the meeting. Notes into the record.
outcome
Promised, measured, accepted. A number nobody signed is claimed, not delivered.
prep
Prepare the meeting. One page from the record.
readout
Report the outcome. Promised, measured, accepted.
receipts
Find the receipt. A dated line, or it did not happen.
trust
Diagnose trust. Process gap, or they stopped trusting you.