Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ViryaZheng/recomby-geoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/viryazheng/recomby-geo/02-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/viryazheng/recomby-geo/02-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/viryazheng/recomby-geo/02-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/viryazheng/recomby-geo/02-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/viryazheng/recomby-geo/02-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.02213 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01107 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00443 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00221 |
Grade A, and why
02-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
02 · Audit — Claude Visibility Baseline
This command measures what Claude tells real users when they ask the brand's target queries — without telling Claude who the client is.
We deliberately scope the baseline to Claude only. Multi-LLM coverage (ChatGPT / Perplexity / Gemini / AI Overviews) sounds appealing but requires per-engine API keys and per-engine output normalization, which turns the plugin into a heavy ops project. Single-engine + reproducible beats multi-engine + flaky.
If you later need cross-engine coverage, the vendored
seo-geo-optimizer (199-bio) skill has multi-engine analysis paths
(see its scripts/platform_optimizer.py).
Inputs
clients/<slug>/brand_context.json— required. Readstarget_queries,layer_1_business_identity.company.name,competitors.
Output
clients/<slug>/visibility_baseline.json(round 1) — validates againstschemas/visibility_baseline.schema.json.clients/<slug>/baselines/round-N.json(round 2+) — preserved snapshots for 07-reaudit diff.clients/<slug>/baseline-report.md— human-readable summary.
Procedure
Step 1 — Prepare query list
jq '.target_queries | map({query, query_id: (.query | gsub(" "; "-") | ascii_downcase), priority, intent})' \
clients/<slug>/brand_context.json > /tmp/queries.json
Strip P2 if budget-tight. Default: run all P0 + P1 + P2.
Step 2 — Define the unbiased query runner
For each query, spawn a fresh sub-agent context that does NOT see the brand_context. The sub-agent answers the query like a normal user — it uses WebSearch + WebFetch as Claude does by default, no system prompt nudging it toward our client.
Procedure for each query (loop):
Sub-agent task prompt (template):
"You are answering a user's question. The user asked: <query>.
Search the web (WebSearch + WebFetch as needed), then write a
substantive answer (300-600 words) the way you would if asked
conversationally. List specific brands/companies/products by
name when relevant. Include the URLs you actually cited."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 221 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 75bcf94866b2
02-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository ViryaZheng/recomby-geo (454 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 2,213 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
commit-all
Stage and commit all current changes with a single message. Auto Git Push will pick up and push to origin within 30s.
check
Run the full local quality gate — TypeScript check, build, dependency audit (prod-only), skill registry validate. Fast pre-commit / pre-suggestdeploy sweep.
registry
Refresh the skills registry — regenerate SHA-256 manifest from disk, then validate. Run after editing any file under .agents/skills/.
onboard
/anty:onboard — QUEST-Based Conversational Interview.
quickstart
/anty:quickstart — 5-Minute Quick Onboarding to First Action.
review
/anty:review — 5-Question Review Engine.