Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Vit129/agy-plugin-cc/plugin install agyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vit129/agy-plugin-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vit129/agy-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vit129/agy-plugin-cc/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vit129/agy-plugin-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vit129/agy-plugin-cc/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00654 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to adversarial-review — 43 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run an agy review by delegating to agy with a structured review prompt.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return agy's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--dry-run, do not ask. Run in the foreground — it only prints the resolved options and available models, no review is performed. - If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, run
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - For working-tree review, also inspect
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For base-branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Treat untracked files as reviewable work even when
git diff --shortstatis empty. - Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant scope is actually empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the scoped review is clearly tiny (roughly 1–2 files, no sign of a broader change).
- In every other case, recommend background.
- For working-tree review, run
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip
--waitor--backgroundyourself.
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with
Bashin the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/agy-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "agy review",
run_in_background: true
})
- Do not wait for completion in this turn.
- After launching the command, tell the user: "agy review started in the background. Check
/agy:statusfor progress."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 58 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 2091f2b6e27b
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Vit129/agy-plugin-cc (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 654 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to adversarial-review, differing in 43 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
delegate
Hand a task to Antigravity (Gemini 3.5) and get the result back inside Claude Code.
review
Cross-model code review of your changes by Gemini 3.5 (read-only, contained).
result
Show the final output (and conversation id) of a finished Antigravity job.
resume
Continue the most recent Antigravity (Gemini 3.5) conversation with a follow-up.
cancel
Cancel a running background Antigravity job.
status
Show running and recent Antigravity jobs for this repo.