Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/volkthienpreecha/modesofthinkingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/volkthienpreecha/modesofthinking/reframe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/volkthienpreecha/modesofthinking/reframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/volkthienpreecha/modesofthinking/reframe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/volkthienpreecha/modesofthinking/reframe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/volkthienpreecha/modesofthinking/reframe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00061 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00024 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
reframe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use the modes-of-thinking skill in reframe mode. Follow that mode's workflow and output contract exactly. Treat the text below as the user's request.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A b63de5113bcd
reframe is a command published in the GitHub repository volkthienpreecha/modesofthinking (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 61 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
init
Initialize configurations for Supabase local development.
skill-refresh
You are running inside a headless Claude Code session in the neo4j-skills repository. Goal: scan Neo4j release notes and deprecation pages, then update any SKILL.md and references/ files that are stale, outdated, or missing new features. Open no PRs or commits — output only file edits. The workflow will handle git and…
export
GDPR Article 20 — export all memories you own as portable JSON.
claude-request
Send a prompt to Claude Code via the LLM gateway with session tracking.
5_gofer_implement
Execute all tasks from tasks.md phase by phase with feedback loops and engineering review.
test
Generate tests for the specified code or feature.