Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/voro6yov/spec-driven-development/templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/voro6yov/spec-driven-developmentWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00921 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00461 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00184 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
template scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 115 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commands Template
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import ClassVar
from ..shared import Command, CommandReply
__all__ = ["{{ command_name }}", "{{ success_reply_name }}", "{{ failure_reply_name }}"]
@dataclass
class {{ command_name }}(Command):
COMMAND_CHANNEL: ClassVar[str] = "{{ command_channel }}"
REPLY_CHANNEL: ClassVar[str] = "{{ reply_channel }}"
{{ correlation_field_1 }}: str
{{ correlation_field_2 }}: str
{{ aggregate_id }}: str
{{ input_field_1 }}: {{ input_type_1 }}
@dataclass
class {{ success_reply_name }}(CommandReply):
{{ correlation_field_1 }}: str
{{ correlation_field_2 }}: str
{{ aggregate_id }}: str
{{ result_field_1 }}: {{ result_type_1 }}
{{ result_field_2 }}: {{ result_type_2 }} | None
@dataclass
class {{ failure_reply_name }}(CommandReply):
{{ correlation_field_1 }}: str
{{ correlation_field_2 }}: str
{{ aggregate_id }}: str
error_message: str
Placeholders — Command
| Placeholder | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
{{ command_name }} |
Imperative verb name | StartLabelProcessing, ProcessSidewallImage |
{{ command_channel }} |
Channel for command routing | LabelProcessing, SidewallProcessing |
{{ reply_channel }} |
Channel for reply routing | TireIdentificationReplies, DocumentReplies |
{{ correlation_field_1 }} |
First correlation identifier | conveyor_id, session_id |
{{ correlation_field_2 }} |
Second correlation identifier | warehouse_id, tenant_id |
{{ aggregate_id }} |
ID of target aggregate | tire_id, document_id |
{{ input_field_1 }} |
Input data for processing | label_text, image_path |
{{ input_type_1 }} |
Type of input data | str, bytes, dict[str, str] |
Placeholders — Success Reply
| Placeholder | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
{{ success_reply_name }} |
Success reply class name | LabelProcessingSuccess, SidewallProcessingSuccess |
{{ result_field_1 }} |
Primary result field | extracted_product_name, classification_result |
{{ result_type_1 }} |
Type of primary result | ExtractedProductName, ClassificationResult |
{{ result_field_2 }} |
Secondary result field | processing_time, confidence_score |
{{ result_type_2 }} |
Type of secondary result | float, dict[str, float] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 115 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 48a138e16703
template is a command published in the GitHub repository voro6yov/spec-driven-development (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 921 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.