Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vyayasan/kyc-analystWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vyayasan/kyc-analyst/risk)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vyayasan/kyc-analyst/risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vyayasan/kyc-analyst/risk/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vyayasan/kyc-analyst/risk"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vyayasan/kyc-analyst/risk.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00333 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00133 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
risk scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Risk
Comprehensive risk reassessment using four-factor heuristic model with updated due diligence requirements based on current risk profile.
Usage
/kyc:risk <customer name>
Risk Factors
| Factor | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Geographic Risk | 30% | Customer jurisdiction, transaction countries, wealth origin |
| Customer Risk | 35% | PEP status, industry, source of wealth clarity, complexity |
| Product Risk | 25% | Account type, expected activity, transaction volume |
| Channel Risk | 10% | Onboarding method, documentation quality |
Risk Bands
| Band | Score Range | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| LOW | 0-20 | CDD sufficient, analyst approval |
| MEDIUM | 21-60 | Enhanced monitoring, senior analyst review |
| HIGH | 61-80 | EDD required, manager + MLRO approval |
| CRITICAL | 81-100 | Immediate escalation, senior management decision |
Deterministic Scoring
The risk score is calculated mathematically from objective inputs. Same inputs always produce the same score. This ensures:
- Reproducibility across analysts
- Fairness across customers
- Auditability for regulators
- Consistency across cases
HITL Checkpoint
Risk rating assignment requires analyst review and sign-off. Automated scoring informs but does not replace human judgment.
Version: 1.0.0 Author: Vyayasan
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 1bb4720d964f
risk is a command published in the GitHub repository vyayasan/kyc-analyst (58 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 333 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
air-gapped-helm-handover
Run a CECL workflow on a loopback-only Helm daemon, hit the consent-tier boundary at evidence export, and cross-check the kernel against the public worker.
zero-egress-emir-proof
Run four EMIR Refit validators inside the browser tab, pack and anchor only the hashes, and hand a supervisor the re-verification recipe.
filings
Scan recent filings on a company and surface material events (director changes, new charges, capital events, insolvency markers). Works on GB / IE / CA / IS / FI / IM / LI / MX / KR.
signed-policy-agentic-commerce
Run an agentic commerce chain under a signed Work Mandate, trip the escalation gate on purpose, and replay the gates on the ledger.
ai-marked-asset-anchored
Validate a C2PA manifest and AI Act Art. 50 marking in the page, replay the content-credential chain remotely, and anchor the disclosure manifest to Bitcoin.
same-law-three-doorways
Run one tool in the page, on the hosted MCP worker, and against its signed receipt, then compare the executionhash character by character.