Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-test-failure)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-test-failure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-test-failure/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-test-failure"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-test-failure.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00967 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00483 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
analyze-prow-job-test-failure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Name
ci:analyze-prow-job-test-failure
Synopsis
Generate a test failure analysis for the given test:
/ci:analyze-prow-job-test-failure <prowjob-url> [test-name] [--fast]
Description
Analyze a failed test by inspecting the test code in the current project and artifacts in Prow CI job. This is done by invoking the "Prow Job Analyze Test Failure" skill.
The command provides comprehensive analysis by:
- Examining test failure stack traces and source code
- Analyzing test execution timeline and cluster events during the test
- Optionally extracting and analyzing must-gather data for cluster-level diagnostics
- HyperShift support: Detects and analyzes both management cluster and hosted cluster must-gather data
- Correlating cluster issues (degraded operators, failing pods, node problems) with test failures
- Enhanced output: Structured Markdown format with clear sections and artifact organization
User Experience
Default (comprehensive analysis):
/ci:analyze-prow-job-test-failure <url>
- No test name needed — analyzes all failed CI steps from JUnit XML, build logs, and step artifacts
- Detects must-gather availability
- Provides correlated step + cluster analysis
- This is the common case for multi-step CI workflows (e.g. HyperShift, bare-metal OADP jobs)
With specific test name:
/ci:analyze-prow-job-test-failure <url> <test-name>
- Focuses analysis on the named test's stack trace and logs
Fast mode (skip must-gather):
/ci:analyze-prow-job-test-failure <url> [test-name] --fast
- Skips must-gather detection and extraction only
- Scope is preserved: test-level when
test-nameis provided, step-level across all failed CI steps when omitted - Faster results, but may miss cluster-level root causes
HyperShift Support
For HyperShift jobs with hosted clusters, the command automatically:
- Detects HyperShift dump archives in various locations (dump-management-cluster, hypershift-mce-dump, run-e2e-local, etc.)
- Extracts archives containing management and/or hosted cluster data
- Splits data into separate directories for independent analysis
- Detects hosted cluster data within archives (hostedcluster-* directory)
- Provides separate diagnostic sections for each cluster
- Correlates issues across both clusters in root cause analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 92 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A bf579f3b7c21
analyze-prow-job-test-failure is a command published in the GitHub repository wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 967 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
bug
Reproduce then TDD-fix a ready-for-agent bug ticket in this checkout. Web bugs get a browser repro first.
eg-fix-bug
Fix a bug using the elephant/goldfish workflow — problem doc, goldfish diagnosis check, failing test, fix, review, validate.
fire-test
Run Dominion Flow plugin integration tests to verify all commands and integrations work correctly.
self-healing
Automatically detect and recover from errors without interrupting your flow.
gofer:tdd
Guide a red-green-refactor loop tied to spec acceptance criteria.