Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/wbh604/fund-guy-skill/quick-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wbh604/fund-guy-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wbh604/fund-guy-skill/quick-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wbh604/fund-guy-skill/quick-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wbh604/fund-guy-skill/quick-check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00327 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00163 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
quick-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
基金速查任务
用户输入: $ARGUMENTS
加载 fund-manager-alpha skill 的速查模式，只做四件事：
- 任期切割 —— 现任经理管了多久，业绩能不能记在他头上（
fetch_fund.py的经理数据） - 持有体验 —— 最大回撤、最长水下天数（"买在山顶要熬几年"）
- 平台分对照 —— pingzhongdata 拉东财五维分，和从业年头/规模一起给个第一印象
- 申赎压力 —— 总份额近几期是流入还是失血
产出：直接在对话里给一段速查结论（不生成 HTML），格式：
- 一句话定调（谁在开车 · 开了多久 · 车况如何）
- 三个最扎眼的数字，每个都有主语和口径
- 要不要跑完整审计的建议
不许给"可以买/不能买"的绝对结论——速查没有做买卖点验尸和独立性取证，证据不足时只能说"值得/不值得花时间深查"。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 24 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 785b65e0bee0
quick-check is a command published in the GitHub repository wbh604/fund-guy-skill (501 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 327 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.