Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WdBlink/autoresearch-paperWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wdblink/autoresearch-paper/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wdblink/autoresearch-paper/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wdblink/autoresearch-paper/fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wdblink/autoresearch-paper/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wdblink/autoresearch-paper/fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01166 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00466 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
autoresearch:fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to autoresearch:fix — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATELY.
Parse Arguments
Extract from $ARGUMENTS:
Target:or--target— command that shows errors (e.g.,npm test,tsc --noEmit)Scope:or--scope— file globs to modifyGuard:or--guard— safety command (must always pass)Iterations:or--iterations— default 20. "unlimited" for unbounded.--from-debug— read handoff.json from previous debug run--category— filter: test, type, lint, build--evals,--evals-interval N,--chain
Setup (if required context missing)
If Target and Scope both missing:
- Auto-detect failures: run test suite, type checker, linter, build
- Present results via AskUserQuestion (single batched call): Q1 (Fix What): "Found [N] test failures, [M] type errors, [K] lint errors. Fix what?" — everything, only tests, only types, only lint Q2 (Guard): "Safety command that must always pass?" — npm test, tsc, npm run build, skip Q3 (Scope): "Which files can I modify?" — suggested globs from error locations + all Q4 (Launch): "Ready?" — fix until zero, fix with limit, cancel If all provided → skip setup. If --from-debug → read handoff.json for scope and findings.
Precondition Checks
Verify: git repo exists, clean working tree, no lock files, no detached HEAD. Fail fast on critical issues.
Establish Baseline (Iteration 0)
- Run Target command → count errors (metric = error count, direction = lower_is_better)
- Record baseline in TSV
- Create output directory:
autoresearch/fix-{YYMMDD}-{HHMM}/ - TSV header:
# metric_direction: lower_is_better\niteration\ttimestamp\terror_type\terror_fixed\tcommit\tmetric\tdelta\tguard\tstatus\tdescription
Iteration Loop (until zero errors or max_iterations)
Phase 1: Review
- Read results TSV + git log
- Run Target to get current error list
- If error count == 0 → exit loop (SUCCESS)
Phase 2: Prioritize
Order: crash/fatal → test failures → type errors → lint → warnings. Within category: easiest first (single-file fixes before cross-file).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 104 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 7ae5a23291f3
autoresearch:fix is a command published in the GitHub repository WdBlink/autoresearch-paper (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,166 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to autoresearch:fix, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
autoresearch:fix compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| autoresearch:fixWdBlink/autoresearch-paper | Command | 2 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| verifyaffaan-m/ECC | Command | 301k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 6 | Claude Code, OpenCode |
| dart-downstream-fixdartsim/dart | Command | 1.2k | yesterday | BSD-2-Clause | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| debugfirst-fluke/oh-my-agent | Command | 1.4k | yesterday | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code |
| eg-fix-bugvshvedov/elephant-goldfish | Command | 94 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| pair:examplesmonoes/monomind | Command | 23 | 2d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| refactor-seguroluanpdd/kit-mcp | Command | 5 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |