Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/webdevtodayjason/titanium-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/webdevtodayjason/titanium-plugins/coderabbit-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/webdevtodayjason/titanium-plugins/coderabbit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/webdevtodayjason/titanium-plugins/coderabbit-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/webdevtodayjason/titanium-plugins/coderabbit-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/webdevtodayjason/titanium-plugins/coderabbit-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01871 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00748 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00374 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00187 |
Grade C, and why
coderabbit-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 376 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CodeRabbit Review Command
You are running CodeRabbit CLI analysis to catch race conditions, memory leaks, security vulnerabilities, and logic errors in uncommitted code changes.
Purpose
CodeRabbit CLI provides AI-powered static analysis that detects:
- Race conditions in concurrent code
- Memory leaks and resource leaks
- Security vulnerabilities
- Logic errors and edge cases
- Performance issues
- Code quality problems
This complements the 3-agent review by finding issues that require deep static analysis.
Prerequisites
CodeRabbit CLI must be installed:
Check installation:
command -v coderabbit >/dev/null 2>&1 || echo "Not installed"
If not installed:
❌ CodeRabbit CLI not found
CodeRabbit CLI is optional but provides enhanced code analysis.
To install:
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh
source ~/.zshrc # or your shell rc file
Then authenticate:
coderabbit auth login
See: https://docs.coderabbit.ai/cli/overview
Skip CodeRabbit and continue? (yes/no)
If skip: Exit If install: Wait for user to install, then continue
Process
Step 1: Check Authentication
coderabbit auth status
If not authenticated:
⚠️ CodeRabbit not authenticated
For enhanced reviews (with team learnings):
coderabbit auth login
Continue without authentication? (yes/no)
Authentication is optional but provides better reviews (Pro feature).
Step 2: Choose Review Mode
Ask user:
CodeRabbit Review Mode:
1. **AI-Optimized** (--prompt-only)
- Token-efficient output
- Optimized for Claude to parse
- Quick fix application
- Recommended for workflows
2. **Detailed** (--plain)
- Human-readable detailed output
- Comprehensive explanations
- Good for learning
- More verbose
Which mode? (1 or 2)
Store choice.
Step 3: Determine Review Scope
Default: Uncommitted changes only
Options:
What should CodeRabbit review?
1. Uncommitted changes only (default)
2. All changes vs main branch
3. All changes vs specific branch
Scope:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 376 lines · 10 tokens per session scan C 3ed142f1340b
coderabbit-review is a command published in the GitHub repository webdevtodayjason/titanium-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,871 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.