Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/wenqingyu/ralphy-openspec/ralphy-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wenqingyu/ralphy-openspecWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wenqingyu/ralphy-openspec/ralphy-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wenqingyu/ralphy-openspec/ralphy-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wenqingyu/ralphy-openspec/ralphy-plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
ralphy-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/ralphy-plan (PRD -> OpenSpec change)
You are an AI coding assistant. Convert the user's PRD/requirements into an OpenSpec change proposal with clear, testable acceptance criteria.
Deliverables (create/modify files)
Create a new change folder:
openspec/changes/<change-name>/proposal.mdopenspec/changes/<change-name>/tasks.mdopenspec/changes/<change-name>/specs/<domain>/spec.md(and others as needed)
Rules
- Use MUST/SHALL language for requirements.
- Every
### Requirement:MUST include at least one#### Scenario:. - Include acceptance criteria that can be validated by tests or deterministic commands.
- Keep scope explicit; list non-goals.
Procedure
- Read
openspec/project.mdand relevant specs underopenspec/specs/. - Propose a kebab-case change name (e.g.
add-profile-filters). - Create
proposal.mdexplaining why/what and the constraints. - Write spec deltas under
specs/using:## ADDED Requirements## MODIFIED Requirements## REMOVED Requirements
- Write
tasks.mdas a numbered checklist. Each task includes:- Implementation notes
- Test plan (what to run, what to assert)
Output
Summarize created files and tell the user what to run next (typically implementation).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 32 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ae213c64dc62
ralphy-plan is a command published in the GitHub repository wenqingyu/ralphy-openspec (182 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed BSD-3-Clause. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 310 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.