Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wesammustafa/opencode-primerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wesammustafa/opencode-primer/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wesammustafa/opencode-primer/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wesammustafa/opencode-primer/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wesammustafa/opencode-primer/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wesammustafa/opencode-primer/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00233 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00093 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a code review with these inputs:
- Scope:
$ARGUMENTSif provided, otherwise the current branch's diff vsmain. - Changed files (always check):
!git diff --name-only main...HEAD
For each changed file, evaluate (in this order):
- Correctness — bugs, race conditions, broken control flow.
- Security — input validation, auth, secrets, OWASP Top 10.
- Performance — N+1 queries, blocking I/O, unbounded loops.
- Maintainability — naming, duplication, missing tests.
Output one entry per finding using this format:
[Severity] <summary>
Where: <file:line>
Why: <one sentence>
Fix: <concrete snippet or instruction>
End with a one-line verdict: LGTM, Approve with comments, or Changes requested.
Do not edit any files in this command — leave the implementation to the developer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 87b6f527e8c8
review is a command published in the GitHub repository wesammustafa/opencode-primer (401 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 233 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-agents-skills
Audit quality of agents, skills, and commands in a Claude Code project.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
implement
Implement in the main agent, with atomic-reviewer gating every checkpoint. For work whose context is already in this conversation, where a fresh subagent would have to re-read what you have already read. Same checkpoints, commit-per-green, and finalize as /subagent-implementation; you write the code.
differential-audit
Audit EARS↔code coherence via a bidirectional differential. With no arguments, opens a scoping conversation that interprets what the user wants audited, maps it to arrows, and captures an explicit EARS selection. With one or more EARS IDs, audits those specs directly using configured defaults. Requires docs/arrows/…
audit-mirage-analyze
Phases 2-3 and 7 of auditing-green-mirage: systematic line-by-line audit, the Green Mirage Patterns, named assertion shapes, and the fix-verification Test Adversary prompt.
create-pr
Create a pull request with proper template discovery and population.