Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to whchoi98/project-init. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/whchoi98/project-init/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whchoi98/project-initWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/whchoi98/project-init/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/whchoi98/project-init/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/whchoi98/project-init/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/whchoi98/project-init/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/whchoi98/project-init/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00275 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00110 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
Review $ARGUMENTS if given; otherwise git diff, falling back to git diff --cached.
Focus on what a generic review misses in this repo:
- Bilingual docs: English and Korean sections have identical structure, code blocks, and tables (ADR-001); language toggles use
#english/#koreananchors (ADR-002) - Version consistency:
marketplace.json(metadata.versionandplugins[0].version) matchesplugin.json - Hardcoded counts (test totals, file counts) in CLAUDE.md, README, or CHANGELOG match reality, or were removed
- Hooks read their JSON input from stdin and block with exit 2 (ADR-008); registration follows ADR-004
- A changed reference template is reflected in the command that consumes it
- Shell scripts pass
bash -n;bash tests/run-all.shpasses
Report only issues you are confident are real, each with file:line and a concrete fix. If nothing qualifies, say so in one line.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -32 lines · -2 tokens per session 362ee74a7341
- 2mo ago First seen · 52 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A afeea38cc2dc
review is a command published in the GitHub repository whchoi98/project-init (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 275 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).