Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00593 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00296 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
신뢰도 기반 스코어링을 사용하여 현재 코드 변경사항을 검토합니다.
Step 1: 변경사항 확인
검토 범위 결정:
- $ARGUMENTS가 파일을 지정한 경우 해당 파일 검토
- 그 외의 경우 미스테이징 변경사항 검토:
git diff - 미스테이징 변경사항이 없으면 스테이징된 변경사항 검토:
git diff --cached
Step 2: 검토 수행
변경된 각 파일에 대해 code-review 스킬 기준 적용:
- 프로젝트 가이드라인 준수 (CLAUDE.md에서)
- 버그 감지 (로직 오류, 보안, 성능)
- 코드 품질 (중복, 복잡성, 테스트 커버리지)
- 프로젝트 특화 검토:
- tests/fixtures/*.json 파일 수정 여부 (절대 금지)
- 매핑 동등성 테스트 누락 확인
- ok() 봉투 응답 형식 준수 여부
- 키 유출 여부 (SEOUL_API_KEY, SEOUL_SUBWAY_API_KEY)
Step 3: 스코어링 및 필터링
각 이슈를 0-100으로 평가합니다. 신뢰도 >= 75인 이슈만 보고합니다.
Step 4: 출력
구조화된 형식으로 검색 결과 제시 (파일 경로, 줄번호, 수정 제안 포함). 이슈가 없으면 코드가 표준을 충족함을 확인합니다.
Error Recovery
Step 1에서 변경사항이 없는 경우
diff 출력이 없다는 것은 검토할 내용이 없다는 의미입니다. 사용자에게 알립니다:
- 변경사항이 커밋되었는지 확인:
git log -1 --oneline - 올바른 브랜치에 있는지 확인:
git branch --show-current - 파일을 직접 지정하도록 제안:
/review path/to/file
Step 2에서 CLAUDE.md가 없거나 비어있는 경우
CLAUDE.md 없이는 프로젝트 가이드라인을 평가할 수 없습니다. 다음을 제안합니다:
/init-project실행하여 CLAUDE.md 생성- 또는 관례 섹션이 있는 최소 CLAUDE.md 생성
diff가 너무 큰 경우 (>500줄)
높은 위험 파일부터 우선 순위 지정:
- 보안 민감 변경사항이 있는 파일 (hooks, scripts)
- 로직 변경이 있는 파일
- 문서 변경 (낮은 우선순위)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 57 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 482946614b1b
review is a command published in the GitHub repository whchoi98/seoul-opendata-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 593 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.