Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to williamzujkowski/standards. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/williamzujkowski/standards/master/.claude/commands/github/pr-enhance.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/williamzujkowski/standardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/williamzujkowski/standards/pr-enhance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/williamzujkowski/standards/pr-enhance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/williamzujkowski/standards/pr-enhance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/williamzujkowski/standards/pr-enhance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/williamzujkowski/standards/pr-enhance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00156 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
pr-enhance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pr-enhance — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
pr-enhance
AI-powered pull request enhancements.
Usage
npx claude-flow github pr-enhance [options]
Options
--pr-number <n>- Pull request number--add-tests- Add missing tests--improve-docs- Improve documentation--check-security- Security review
Examples
# Enhance PR
npx claude-flow github pr-enhance --pr-number 123
# Add tests
npx claude-flow github pr-enhance --pr-number 123 --add-tests
# Full enhancement
npx claude-flow github pr-enhance --pr-number 123 --add-tests --improve-docs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 30 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A fcdc5a6b310d
pr-enhance is a command published in the GitHub repository williamzujkowski/standards (18 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 156 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pr-enhance, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
quality-check-command
This command performs comprehensive code quality checks. Use it before commits or when implementation is complete.
bug-check
Run automated tests and build checks first, then agent code review. For each bug found, propose or document a regression test.
auditar-refactor
Invoca refactor-safety-auditor — gate canônico antes de qualquer refactor. Coleta evidências (linhas, contrato externo, coverage, mutation) e retorna veredito GO/BLOCK/WARN/GO-OVERRIDE.
audio-pass
Functional audio review for implementation, mix coverage, clarity, and player feedback.
security-sast
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for code vulnerability analysis across multiple languages and frameworks.