Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/with-geun/alive-analysisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/analysis-dr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/analysis-dr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/analysis-dr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/analysis-dr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/analysis-dr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01828 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00731 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00366 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00183 |
Grade A, and why
analysis-dr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 234 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/analysis-dr
Manage Analysis Decision Records — the team's append-only log of methodology decisions.
Subcommands: new | scan | list | show {NNN}
Instructions
Step 1: Parse subcommand
Read $ARGUMENTS:
newor no argument → write a new DR (go to Step 2a)scan→ scan analyses for DR candidates (go to Step 2b)list→ display the DR index (go to Step 2c)show {NNN}→ display a specific DR (go to Step 2d)
If argument is ambiguous, default to new.
Step 2a: New DR
Goal: Help the user write a well-formed DR, or propose one based on current context.
Step 2a-1: Load context
Read these files to understand what might need a DR right now:
.analysis/config.md— current metrics, team context.analysis/status.md— active analyses- For each active analysis folder, read its most recent stage file (e.g.,
03_investigate.mdif at INVESTIGATE) analyses/decisions/INDEX.md— existing DRs (to avoid duplicates)
Step 2a-2: Check for decision signals
Look for signals that a decision was made or is being debated:
- Metric being defined or redefined in the current analysis
- Statistical method chosen (A/B test, regression, etc.)
- Segment or time window that was argued about
- Model algorithm that was selected over alternatives
If strong signals found, propose a DR draft:
📋 DR 초안 제안
분석에서 다음 결정이 발견됐어요. DR로 기록하면 좋을 것 같아요:
유형: {Metric | Methodology | Scope | Model | Principle}
제목 초안: "{결정 제목}"
결정 내용: "{한 문장 초안}"
이대로 작성할까요, 아니면 직접 내용을 알려주세요?
If no strong signals, ask the user:
어떤 결정을 DR로 남기고 싶으세요?
유형을 알려주시면 해당 템플릿으로 안내해드릴게요:
Metric — 지표 정의
Methodology — 분석 방법론
Scope — 세그먼트/기간 범위
Model — 모델/알고리즘 선택
Principle — 분석 원칙
Step 2a-3: Determine next DR number
Read analyses/decisions/INDEX.md.
Count existing DRs and increment by 1 (e.g., if DR-005 is last → new DR is DR-006).
If INDEX.md doesn't exist yet, start with DR-001.
Step 2a-4: Write the DR
Collect or confirm these fields with the user:
- 결정: one sentence, what was decided
- 배경: what triggered this decision
- 근거: why this choice, what alternatives were rejected
- 트레이드오프: what costs are accepted
- 검토 트리거: when to reconsider
- 참고 분석: analysis folder path (optional)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 234 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 52eb887db423
analysis-dr is a command published in the GitHub repository with-geun/alive-analysis (41 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,828 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
project_init
A command that starts tracking a project with ocul-pm by creating its project records and agent logging rules.
standup
A command that creates a daily stand-up report from an ocul-pm project's work logs and plan. A stand-up is a short update on completed work, blocked work, and next steps.
inception
A command for starting the design of a new project or major feature area. It guides research, agreement on the specification, a detailed three-level plan, evaluation checks, and initial project rules.
start-shopify-app
Start a beginner-friendly Shopify app project from idea or an existing repository.
add-webhook
Add a reliable authenticated Shopify event handler and test failure cases.
audit-scopes
Audit Shopify scopes and protected-data access without expanding permissions.