Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/with-geun/alive-analysisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/experiment-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/experiment-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/experiment-new.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02773 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01386 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00555 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00277 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 281 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/experiment new
Start a new A/B test experiment.
Instructions
You are helping the user design and run a structured experiment using the ALIVE loop adapted for A/B testing: Design → Validate → Analyze → Decide → Learn.
Follow these steps in order. Do NOT auto-fill any content — ask the user and build the experiment together through conversation.
Step 1: Ask initial questions
Q1: What do you want to test? Understand the change, feature, or hypothesis the user wants to experiment with.
- "What change are you testing? Describe the control (current) and treatment (new)."
Q2: Full or Quick?
- Full Experiment — For experiments with business impact. 5 files, full statistical rigor, checklists.
- Quick Experiment — For low-risk experiments (feature flag toggles, small UI tweaks). Single file, abbreviated.
Guide:
- "Will this experiment influence a product/business decision?" → Full
- "Is this a quick validation or low-stakes test?" → Quick
Q3: What's the primary metric? The single metric that determines success or failure.
- "If you could only look at ONE number to decide whether this worked, what would it be?"
- Reference config.md metrics if available.
Q4: Guardrail metrics? Metrics that must NOT get worse. Reference config.md guardrails.
- "What must NOT break if this experiment succeeds? (e.g., crash rate, page load time, revenue)"
Q5: How long can this experiment run?
- "What's the maximum duration you'd accept? (1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks)"
- This informs sample size feasibility.
Step 2: Generate ID
Read .analysis/status.md to determine the next sequence number for today.
- Full Experiment:
E-{YYYY}-{MMDD}-{seq}(e.g.,E-2026-0215-001) - Quick Experiment:
QE-{YYYY}-{MMDD}-{seq}(e.g.,QE-2026-0215-001)
Sequence resets daily, starts at 001.
Step 3: Create files
3A. Full Experiment
Create folder: ab-tests/active/{ID}_{title-slug}/
Generate 01_design.md:
# DESIGN: {title}
> ID: {ID} | Type: 🧪 Experiment | Stage: 📐 DESIGN | Started: {YYYY-MM-DD}
## Hypothesis
- **If** we {change/treatment description},
- **Then** {primary metric} will {direction} by {expected magnitude},
- **Because** {mechanism/reasoning}.
## Experiment Setup
- **Control**: {current experience}
- **Treatment**: {new experience}
- **Variants**: {number of variants, including control}
- **Randomization unit**: user / session / device / other
- **Traffic allocation**: {control %}% / {treatment %}%
- **Target population**: {all users / specific segment}
- **Exclusions**: {who should NOT be in the experiment}
## Metric Structure
### Primary Metric (decision criterion)
| Metric | Current Baseline | MDE (Minimum Detectable Effect) | Direction |
|--------|-----------------|--------------------------------|-----------|
| {metric} | {value} | {absolute or relative change} | ↑ / ↓ |
### Secondary Metrics (additional insight)
| Metric | Baseline | Expected Direction | Why Track |
|--------|----------|--------------------|-----------|
| | | | |
| | | | |
### Guardrail Metrics (must not degrade)
| Metric | Current Value | Acceptable Range | Source |
|--------|--------------|-------------------|--------|
| | | | config.md / custom |
## Sample Size Calculation
- **Test type**: two-sided / one-sided
- **Significance level (α)**: 0.05
- **Power (1-β)**: 0.80
- **Baseline rate/mean**: {from primary metric}
- **MDE**: {from primary metric}
- **Required sample size per variant**: {AI calculates}
- **With current daily traffic ({N}/day)**: ~{X} days needed
- **Feasibility**: ✅ fits within timeline / ⚠️ tight / 🔴 not feasible
> 💡 AI will guide through the calculation:
> - For proportions: n = (Z_α/2 + Z_β)² × [p₁(1-p₁) + p₂(1-p₂)] / (p₁-p₂)²
> - For means: n = (Z_α/2 + Z_β)² × 2σ² / δ²
> - Practical shortcut: "Can we get {n} users per variant within {max duration}?"
## Duration & Schedule
- **Start date**: {planned}
- **Minimum duration**: {from sample size calculation}
- **Maximum duration**: {from Q5}
- **Include full week cycles**: Yes (avoid day-of-week effects)
- **Ramp-up plan**: {start at X% → full allocation after Y days} / none
## Risk Assessment
- **Worst-case scenario**: If treatment is bad, what's the impact?
- **Rollback trigger**: {specific condition for emergency stop}
- **Blast radius**: {number of affected users, revenue at risk}
- **Reversibility**: Fully reversible / Partially / Irreversible
## Stakeholders
- **Experiment owner**: {name}
- **Decision maker**: {name/role}
- **Engineering contact**: {name}
## Provenance
- Triggered by analysis: {analysis ID, if any — e.g., "F-2026-0210-001 found that X correlates with Y"}
- Key finding that motivated this experiment:
## Pre-registration
> This section locks the analysis plan BEFORE seeing results (prevents p-hacking).
- Primary metric: {locked}
- Success threshold: {locked — what constitutes a "win"?}
- Analysis method: {locked — frequentist / bayesian / both}
- Segment analysis planned: {list segments you'll check, if any}
- Decision framework: {when to Launch / Kill / Extend / Iterate}
---
{Insert DESIGN checklist from ab-tests/checklists/design.md}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 281 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 12f40caabd47
experiment-new is a command published in the GitHub repository with-geun/alive-analysis (41 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,773 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
next
A command that takes the next unfinished leaf item from an active project plan and runs one implementation cycle. The cycle includes implementation, verification, journal entry, and plan-status update.
project_init
A command that starts tracking a project with ocul-pm by creating its project records and agent logging rules.
inception
A command for starting the design of a new project or major feature area. It guides research, agreement on the specification, a detailed three-level plan, evaluation checks, and initial project rules.
standup
A command that creates a daily stand-up report from an ocul-pm project's work logs and plan. A stand-up is a short update on completed work, blocked work, and next steps.
graphql
Build version-safe Shopify Admin GraphQL queries and mutations, optimize query cost, and implement error handling.
optimize-listing
Optimize Shopify App Store listing for search discovery, conversion, and Built for Shopify certification requirements.