Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/with-geun/alive-analysisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/model-register)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/model-register"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/model-register/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/model-register"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/model-register.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01190 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00476 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00238 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
model-register scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/model register
Register a deployed model from a Modeling analysis into the model registry.
Instructions
Step 1: Check prerequisites
- Check if
.analysis/models/folder exists. If not, create it. - Read
.analysis/config.mdfor team context.
Step 2: Identify the model
Three paths:
- From analysis: "Register a model from a completed Modeling analysis" → ask for analysis ID, read the EVOLVE stage for model details
- From experiment: "Register a model validated through an experiment" → ask for experiment ID
- New model: "Register an existing deployed model" → guide through definition
If from analysis:
- Resolve file path:
analyses/active/{ID}_{slug}/05_evolve.mdoranalyses/archive/{YYYY-MM}/{ID}_{slug}/05_evolve.md - Extract: model name, type, performance metrics, features, deployment status
Version detection: Check .analysis/models/ for existing model cards matching the same slug ({slug}_v*.md):
- If found (retraining): Read the latest version card.
- Auto-increment version: new version = latest + 1
- Copy the Version History table from the latest card — append the new version row
- Ask: "The previous version (v{N}) is currently {status}. Should it be marked as
retired?" If yes, update the previous card's Status toretired (replaced by v{N+1}) - In status.md Models table, update the existing row to the new version
- If not found (new model): version starts at v1
Step 3: Create model card
Create file: .analysis/models/{model-slug}_v{version}.md
# Model: {name}
> Version: v{version}
> Type: {classification / regression / clustering / recommendation / forecasting}
> Status: {deployed / staging / retired}
> Registered: {YYYY-MM-DD}
## Origin
- Analysis: {analysis ID, if any}
- Experiment: {experiment ID, if any — validation experiment}
- Owner: {team/person}
## Performance
| Metric | Train | Validation | Test | Production |
|--------|-------|------------|------|------------|
| {primary: AUC/RMSE/F1/etc.} | | | | |
| {secondary} | | | | |
- **Baseline comparison**: {vs. previous model or simple heuristic}
- **Business impact**: {e.g., "Reduces false positives by 15%, saving ~$50K/month"}
## Features
| Feature | Type | Importance | Source |
|---------|------|------------|--------|
| {feature_1} | numeric/categorical | high/medium/low | {table.column} |
| {feature_2} | | | |
- **Feature count**: {N}
- **Known leakage risks**: {if any}
## Training
- **Algorithm**: {e.g., XGBoost, LightGBM, logistic regression, neural net}
- **Training data**: {date range, sample size, sampling method}
- **Hyperparameters**: {key params or link to config file}
- **Training time**: {approximate}
- **Reproducibility**: {notebook/script location in assets/}
## Deployment
- **Endpoint/service**: {where the model is served}
- **Input format**: {expected input schema}
- **Output format**: {prediction format}
- **Latency requirement**: {p99 target}
- **Fallback**: {what happens if model fails}
## Monitoring
- **Drift detection**: {method — PSI, KS test, etc.}
- **Retraining trigger**: {condition — e.g., "AUC drops below 0.85", "monthly schedule"}
- **Retraining cadence**: {planned schedule}
- **Monitor ID**: {M-..., if metric monitor is set up}
## Version History
| Version | Date | Change | Performance Δ | Reason |
|---------|------|--------|---------------|--------|
| v{N} | {date} | {what changed} | {metric change} | {why} |
## Risks & Limitations
- **Known biases**: {if any}
- **Population limitations**: {model trained on X, may not generalize to Y}
- **Staleness risk**: {how quickly does the model degrade?}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 05095632a923
model-register is a command published in the GitHub repository with-geun/alive-analysis (41 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,190 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
prompt-eval-debug
Debug any prompt with a tiny eval suite (control, edge, boundary), failure diagnosis, and smallest next change, no blind rewrite.
setup-gemini.en
Command "setup-gemini.en" from minicoohei/ai-agent-camp, covering gemini api setup, step 0: check setup progress, what you'll do in this session, readiness check and step 1: open google ai studio in the browser.
agent-system-prompt
Write a system prompt for an AI agent that defines its role, tools, boundaries, and output clearly enough to act reliably.
add-webhook
Add a reliable authenticated Shopify event handler and test failure cases.
optimize-listing
Draft an accurate Shopify App Store listing from verified product evidence.
check-shopify-app
Check readiness and explain the next blockers before releasing a Shopify app.