Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/with-geun/alive-analysisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/monitor-setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/monitor-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/monitor-setup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/monitor-setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/with-geun/alive-analysis/monitor-setup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01651 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00330 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
monitor-setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 179 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/monitor setup
Set up a new metric monitor or register a metric definition.
Instructions
You are helping the user set up structured metric monitoring. This command does two things:
- Register a metric definition in
.analysis/metrics/definitions/ - Create a monitor for that metric in
.analysis/metrics/monitors/
Follow these steps in order.
Step 1: Check prerequisites
- Check if
.analysis/metrics/folder exists. If not, create the structure:.analysis/metrics/ ├── definitions/ │ ├── north-star/ │ ├── leading/ │ ├── guardrail/ │ └── diagnostic/ ├── monitors/ └── alerts/ - Read
.analysis/config.mdfor existing metric framework (North Star, Leading, Guardrail, Diagnostic).
Step 2: Identify the metric
Q1: Which metric do you want to monitor?
Three paths:
- From config.md: "Pick from your existing metrics in config.md" → show list
- From EVOLVE proposal: "Register a metric proposed during analysis" → ask for analysis ID, then:
- Resolve file path: Full analysis →
analyses/active/{ID}_{slug}/05_evolve.md, Quick →analyses/active/quick_{ID}_{slug}.md(EVOLVE section) - Read the "Proposed New Metrics" section and extract: Background, Purpose (including proposed tier), Definition & Logic, Interpretation Guide, STEDII Validation
- Use the extracted content to pre-fill the metric definition in Step 3
- STEDII carry-forward: If the EVOLVE proposal has completed STEDII checkboxes (
[x]), carry them into the definition. If any are unchecked ([ ]), guide the user through the remaining criteria before proceeding.
- Resolve file path: Full analysis →
- New metric: "Define a new metric from scratch" → guide through definition
Step 3: Register metric definition (if not already registered)
If the metric doesn't have a definition file yet, create one.
Create file: .analysis/metrics/definitions/{tier}/{metric-slug}.md
# Metric: {name}
> Tier: {🌟 North Star / 📊 Leading / 🛡️ Guardrail / 🔬 Diagnostic}
> Registered: {YYYY-MM-DD}
> Owner: {team/person}
> Source: {config.md / analysis {ID} / experiment {ID} / new}
## Definition
- **What it measures**: (one sentence)
- **Formula**: {calculation}
- **Data source**: {table, API, dashboard}
- **Granularity**: daily / weekly / monthly / per-cohort
- **Refresh cadence**: {how often the data updates}
## Interpretation
- **Direction**: ↑ higher is better / ↓ lower is better
- **Healthy range**: {min} — {max}
- **Warning threshold**: {value}
- **Critical threshold**: {value}
- **Counter-metric**: {what to watch to prevent gaming}
## Context
- **Plain-language**: "When this goes up, it means... When it drops, it means..."
- **Segments that behave differently**: {list}
- **Seasonal patterns**: {if any}
- **Known data caveats**: {if any}
## STEDII Validation
- [x] **Sensitive** — {evidence}
- [x] **Trustworthy** — {evidence}
- [x] **Efficient** — {evidence}
- [x] **Debuggable** — {evidence}
- [x] **Interpretable** — {evidence}
- [x] **Inclusive** — {evidence}
## History
| Date | Change | Reason |
|------|--------|--------|
| {YYYY-MM-DD} | Created | {source} |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 179 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3ec3de24a3a5
monitor-setup is a command published in the GitHub repository with-geun/alive-analysis (41 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,651 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
project_init
A command that starts tracking a project with ocul-pm by creating its project records and agent logging rules.
standup
A command that creates a daily stand-up report from an ocul-pm project's work logs and plan. A stand-up is a short update on completed work, blocked work, and next steps.
inception
A command for starting the design of a new project or major feature area. It guides research, agreement on the specification, a detailed three-level plan, evaluation checks, and initial project rules.
start-shopify-app
Start a beginner-friendly Shopify app project from idea or an existing repository.
add-webhook
Add a reliable authenticated Shopify event handler and test failure cases.
audit-scopes
Audit Shopify scopes and protected-data access without expanding permissions.