Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/constitution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/constitution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/constitution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/constitution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/constitution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.01745 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00698 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
constitution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
用户输入：$ARGUMENTS
目标
建立小说创作的核心原则和价值观，形成创作的"宪法"文件。这些原则将指导后续所有创作决策。
执行步骤
1. 检查现有文档
首先检查是否存在风格参考文档（来自 /book-internalize）：
test -f memory/style-reference.md && echo "exists" || echo "not-found"
- 如果存在，使用 Read 工具读取
memory/style-reference.md - 然后告诉用户："检测到您已完成对标作品分析，我将参考该风格帮您起草宪法。"
然后检查现有宪法：
test -f memory/constitution.md && echo "exists" || echo "not-found"
- 如果存在（输出 "exists"），使用 Read 工具读取
memory/constitution.md并准备更新 - 如果不存在（输出 "not-found"），跳过读取步骤，直接准备创建新宪法
2. 收集创作原则
基于用户输入，收集以下维度的原则（如未提供则询问或推断）：
核心价值观
- 作品要传递什么核心理念？
- 什么是绝对不能违背的底线？
- 创作的根本目的是什么？
质量标准
- 逻辑一致性要求
- 文字质量标准
- 更新频率承诺
- 完成度保证
创作风格原则
- 叙事风格（简洁/华丽/朴实/诗意）
- 节奏控制（快速/缓慢/张弛有度）
- 情感基调（热血/深沉/轻松/严肃）
- 语言特色（古风/现代/口语/书面）
内容原则
- 角色塑造原则
- 每个角色必须有完整动机
- 角色成长必须符合逻辑
- 对话必须符合角色身份
- 情节设计原则
- 冲突设计原则
- 转折合理性要求
- 伏笔回收原则
- 世界观原则
- 设定自洽性要求
- 细节真实性标准
- 文化考据要求
读者导向原则
- 目标读者定位
- 读者体验保证
- 互动反馈原则
创作纪律
- 日常写作规范
- 修改和完善流程
- 版本管理原则
3. 起草宪法文档
使用以下模板结构：
# 小说创作宪法
## 元数据
- 版本：[版本号，如 1.0.0]
- 创建日期：[YYYY-MM-DD]
- 最后修订：[YYYY-MM-DD]
- 作者：[作者名]
- 作品：[作品名或"通用"]
## 前言
[阐述为什么需要这份宪法，以及它的约束力]
## 第一章：核心价值观
### 原则1：[原则名称]
**声明**：[原则的明确表述]
**理由**：[为什么这个原则重要]
**执行**：[如何在创作中体现]
### 原则2：[原则名称]
[同上格式]
## 第二章：质量标准
### 标准1：逻辑一致性
**要求**：[具体要求]
**验证方法**：[如何验证]
**违反后果**：[必须修正]
[更多标准...]
## 第三章：创作风格
### 风格原则1：[名称]
**定义**：[什么是这种风格]
**范例**：[具体例子]
**禁忌**：[绝对不要做什么]
[更多风格原则...]
## 第四章：内容规范
### 角色塑造规范
[具体规范内容]
### 情节设计规范
[具体规范内容]
### 世界观构建规范
[具体规范内容]
## 第五章：读者契约
### 对读者的承诺
- [承诺1]
- [承诺2]
- [承诺3]
### 底线保证
- [保证1]
- [保证2]
## 第六章：修订程序
### 修订触发条件
- 重大创作方向调整
- 读者反馈累积
- 个人成长和认识变化
### 修订流程
1. 提出修订动议
2. 评估影响
3. 更新版本
4. 记录变更
## 附录：版本历史
- v1.0.0 (日期)：初始版本
- [后续版本记录]
4. 版本管理
- 主版本号：重大原则变更或删除
- 次版本号：新增原则或章节
- 修订号：措辞优化、澄清说明
5. 一致性传播
检查并更新相关文件以保持一致：
- 在后续命令中引用宪法原则
- 建议更新 README 中的创作理念部分
6. 生成影响报告
输出宪法创建/更新的影响：
## 宪法影响报告
- 版本：[旧版本] → [新版本]
- 新增原则：[列表]
- 修改原则：[列表]
- 影响范围：
✅ 规格定义需遵循宪法
✅ 计划制定需符合原则
✅ 创作执行需遵守规范
✅ 验证需检查合规性
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 238 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A d23a40dd8241
constitution is a command published in the GitHub repository wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills (271 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,745 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
constitution compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| constitutionwordflowlab/novel-writer-skills | Command | 271 | 1y ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |