Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00875 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00350 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
专家模式
根据用户输入执行相应操作:
1. 列出可用专家(无参数时)
如果用户输入 /expert 不带参数,显示所有可用专家:
核心专家
-
plot - 剧情结构专家
- 精通三幕、英雄之旅、故事圈等叙事结构
- 分析情节问题、优化节奏、设计冲突升级
-
character - 人物塑造专家
- 人物弧光设计、动机分析、性格塑造
- 对话优化、声音区分、关系构建
-
world - 世界观设计专家
- 世界观构建、设定一致性、文化背景
- 规则体系、历史脉络、地理环境
-
style - 文风语言专家
- 叙述技巧、修辞手法、语言风格
- 文风统一、氛围营造、节奏把控
插件专家
扫描 plugins/ 目录,如果存在带有专家配置的插件,列出:
- 检查每个插件目录下的
config.yaml - 如果包含
experts字段,显示专家信息
使用示例:/expert plot 激活剧情结构专家
2. 激活专家模式
用户输入:/expert <type> (如 /expert plot)
执行步骤:
-
确认专家类型
- 核心专家:读取
.specify/experts/core/<type>.md - 插件专家:读取对应插件的专家文件
- 核心专家:读取
-
加载专家配置 读取专家定义文件,获取:
- 身份定位
- 专业领域
- 工作方式
- 分析框架
-
进入专家模式
✨ 已激活【<专家名称>】模式 [显示专家的自我介绍] 我现在会从专业角度为您提供 <领域> 方面的深度指导。 有什么可以帮助您的吗? -
模式特征
- 保持专家视角和专业术语
- 提供深度分析而非快速答案
- 引用相关理论和方法论
- 主动提出诊断性问题
3. 专家模式行为准则
进入专家模式后:
- 保持专业身份:始终以该领域专家的视角交流
- 深度优先:提供详细分析而非简单建议
- 理论支撑:引用相关专业理论和框架
- 主动引导:通过提问帮助用户深入思考
- 持续模式:直到用户使用其他
/命令才退出
4. 退出专家模式
当用户使用任何其他 / 命令时:
- 自动退出专家模式
- 执行新命令
- 回到正常交互模式
无需显式退出命令,保持使用流畅性。
5. 错误处理
-
如果指定的专家不存在:
未找到专家类型:<type> 可用的专家有:plot, character, world, style 使用 /expert 查看所有可用专家 -
如果专家文件读取失败:
专家配置加载失败,请检查文件是否存在: .specify/experts/core/<type>.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A b7fe063e15e5
expert is a command published in the GitHub repository wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills (271 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 875 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
expert compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| expertwordflowlab/novel-writer-skills | Command | 271 | 1y ago | MIT | A | 8 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |