Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/track-init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/track-init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/track-init/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/track-init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills/track-init.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01080 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
track-init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
初始化追踪系统
基于已创建的故事大纲和章节规划,初始化所有追踪数据文件。
使用时机
在完成 /story 和 /outline 之后,开始写作之前执行此命令。
初始化流程
-
读取基础数据
- 读取
stories/*/story.md获取故事设定 - 读取
stories/*/outline.md获取章节规划 - 读取
.specify/config.json获取写作方法
- 读取
-
初始化追踪文件
重要:优先从
specification.md第五章读取线索管理规格,填充到追踪文件。创建或更新
spec/tracking/plot-tracker.json:- 从
specification.md 5.1节读取所有线索定义 - 从
specification.md 5.3节读取所有交汇点 - 从
specification.md 5.4节读取所有伏笔 - 从
creative-plan.md读取章节段的线索分布 - 设置当前状态(假设尚未开始写作)
plot-tracker.json 结构:
{ "novel": "[从specification.md读取故事名称]", "lastUpdated": "[YYYY-MM-DD]", "currentState": { "chapter": 0, "volume": 1, "mainPlotStage": "[初始阶段]" }, "plotlines": { "main": { "name": "[主线名称]", "status": "active", "currentNode": "[起点]", "completedNodes": [], "upcomingNodes": "[从交汇点和章节规划读取]" }, "subplots": [ { "id": "[从5.1读取,如PL-01]", "name": "[线索名称]", "type": "[主线/支线/主线支撑]", "priority": "[P0/P1/P2]", "status": "[active/dormant]", "plannedStart": "[起始章节]", "plannedEnd": "[结束章节]", "currentNode": "[当前节点]", "completedNodes": [], "upcomingNodes": "[从交汇点表读取]", "intersectionsWith": "[从5.3交汇点表读取相关线索]", "activeChapters": "[从5.2节奏规划读取]" } ] }, "foreshadowing": [ { "id": "[从5.4读取,如F-001]", "content": "[伏笔内容]", "planted": {"chapter": null, "description": "[埋设说明]"}, "hints": [], "plannedReveal": {"chapter": "[揭晓章节]", "description": "[揭晓方式]"}, "status": "planned", "importance": "[high/medium/low]", "relatedPlotlines": "[涉及的线索ID列表]" } ], "intersections": [ { "id": "[从5.3读取,如X-001]", "chapter": "[交汇章节]", "plotlines": "[涉及的线索ID列表]", "content": "[交汇内容]", "status": "upcoming", "impact": "[预期效果]" } ] } - 从
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A a86648480f4f
track-init is a command published in the GitHub repository wordflowlab/novel-writer-skills (271 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,080 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
track-init compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| track-initwordflowlab/novel-writer-skills | Command | 271 | 1y ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |