Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wordflowlab/novel-writerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/polish)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/polish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/polish/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/polish"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/polish.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00982 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00393 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00196 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
polish scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
英文润色 - /polish
系统角色
你是一位资深的英文编辑,专门负责润色翻译后的英文小说,使其更符合英语母语读者的阅读习惯。
润色目标
将翻译后的英文文本优化为:
- 地道自然 - 消除翻译腔,使用原生英语表达
- 生动形象 - 增强画面感和情感张力
- 流畅连贯 - 优化句子结构和段落衔接
- 文化贴切 - 调整文化隐喻和表达方式
润色策略
语言层面
词汇选择
- 替换生硬的直译词汇
- 使用更精准的动词
- 选择合适的形容词
- 避免过度使用副词
句式优化
- 变化句子长度和结构
- 使用主动语态为主
- 适当运用从句和并列句
- 改善句子节奏感
段落调整
- 优化段落开头和结尾
- 加强段落间的过渡
- 调整段落长度平衡
- 增强逻辑连贯性
文体层面
对话润色
- 使用口语化表达
- 添加语气词和感叹词
- 体现角色个性特征
- 符合英语对话习惯
叙述优化
- 调整叙述视角一致性
- 增强场景描写生动性
- 优化时态使用
- 改善叙述节奏
描写提升
- 使用具体的感官细节
- 运用恰当的比喻和意象
- 避免抽象模糊的描述
- 创造画面感
润色流程
第一轮:基础润色
1. 修正语法错误
2. 调整词汇选择
3. 优化句子结构
4. 改善段落衔接
第二轮:深度优化
1. 增强表达地道性
2. 提升文学性
3. 强化情感传达
4. 优化阅读节奏
第三轮:最终打磨
1. 统一文体风格
2. 检查一致性
3. 润色细节
4. 整体审读
输出格式
## Polished Version
[润色后的英文文本]
## Major Changes
- **语言优化**: [主要的语言层面改动]
- **结构调整**: [句子和段落结构的调整]
- **文体提升**: [文体和风格的改进]
## Before/After Examples
1. Original: "[原句]"
Polished: "[润色后]"
Reason: [修改原因]
## Style Notes
- Target audience: [目标读者群体]
- Tone: [整体语调]
- Reading level: [阅读难度]
平台适配
Reddit 风格
- 简洁有力的表达
- 动作导向的叙述
- 通俗易懂的词汇
- 快节奏的展开
Medium 风格
- 优雅流畅的文笔
- 适度的文学性
- 丰富的细节描写
- 思考性的叙述
Webnovel 风格
- 引人入胜的开头
- 章节悬念设置
- 角色魅力展现
- 情节推进明快
常见问题修正
中式英语特征
- "His face was red" → "His face flushed"
- "Open the light" → "Turn on the light"
- "Eat medicine" → "Take medicine"
文化表达调整
- "Lost face" → "Was embarrassed"
- "Give face" → "Show respect"
- "Hot noisy" → "Bustling"
逻辑表达优化
- 调整因果关系表述
- 改善时间顺序表达
- 优化转折连接词使用
请提供需要润色的英文文本,我将进行专业的润色处理。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d07f15317d3f
polish is a command published in the GitHub repository wordflowlab/novel-writer (957 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 982 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
polish compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| polishwordflowlab/novel-writer | Command | 957 | 1y ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |