Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wordflowlab/novel-writerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/wangyu-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/wangyu-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/wangyu-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/wangyu-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wordflowlab/novel-writer/wangyu-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01012 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00405 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
wangyu-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
忘语风格分析
分析文本是否符合忘语风格特征,提供详细的评分报告和改进建议。
使用方法
/wangyu-analyze [文本或文件路径]
分析维度
1. 世界观严谨度(1-10分)
- 力量体系是否清晰完整
- 资源设定是否合理
- 地理环境是否具体
- 势力格局是否明确
2. 叙事风格(1-10分)
- 是否保持冷静客观
- 有无过度华丽辞藻
- 叙事节奏是否得当
- 描写是否精准详实
3. 人物塑造(1-10分)
- 主角是否谨慎务实
- 配角是否立体丰满
- 人物行为是否合理
- 关系是否复杂真实
4. 资源意识(1-10分)
- 是否体现资源稀缺
- 获取难度是否合理
- 价值体系是否明确
- 竞争是否激烈
5. 悬念设置(1-10分)
- 是否有效埋设伏笔
- 悬念是否环环相扣
- 回收是否合理
- 是否保持神秘感
示例分析
用户:/wangyu-analyze "林平手持长剑,运转真气,一剑斩出,剑气纵横,瞬间击败了对手。"
AI:忘语风格分析报告
═══════════════════
整体评分:4.5/10 (不太符合忘语风格)
详细评分:
┌─────────────┬─────┬──────────────────────┐
│ 维度 │ 得分 │ 问题分析 │
├─────────────┼─────┼──────────────────────┤
│ 世界观严谨度 │ 3/10│ 缺少具体境界说明 │
│ 叙事风格 │ 4/10│ 过于简单直白 │
│ 人物塑造 │ 5/10│ 人物过于单薄 │
│ 资源意识 │ 3/10│ 未体现法宝珍贵性 │
│ 悬念设置 │ 2/10│ 缺少悬念和伏笔 │
└─────────────┴─────┴──────────────────────┘
主要问题:
1. ❌ 战斗描写过于简单,缺少细节
2. ❌ 未说明人物修为境界
3. ❌ "瞬间击败"太过轻松
4. ❌ 缺少战术和策略描写
改进建议:
1. 添加具体的境界描述(如"筑基后期")
2. 详细描写剑法和真气运转
3. 增加战斗的来回较量
4. 体现法器的珍贵和消耗
忘语风格改写示例:
"林平深吸一口气,体内筑基后期的法力缓缓运转。他手中的青锋剑乃是一件上品法器,此刻剑身上符文隐现,散发着淡淡寒光。
对面的黑衣修士同样筑基后期,见状冷笑一声,祭出一面龟甲盾牌。
林平目光一凝,这一战恐怕没那么容易。他需要速战速决,否则法力消耗过大,后果难料。想到此处,他悄然捏碎了袖中的一张二阶灵符……"
分析选项
--detail- 提供更详细的分析--suggest- 提供具体修改建议--rewrite- 直接给出忘语风格改写版本--compare- 与《凡人修仙传》原文对比
评分标准
- 9-10分:完美符合忘语风格
- 7-8分:基本符合,略有瑕疵
- 5-6分:部分符合,需要改进
- 3-4分:不太符合,问题较多
- 1-2分:完全不符,需要重写
相关命令
/wangyu-style- 激活忘语风格/wangyu-write- 忘语风格创作/wangyu-enhance- 强化风格特征
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 103 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e3030946eeb6
wangyu-analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository wordflowlab/novel-writer (957 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,012 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
wangyu-analyze compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| wangyu-analyzewordflowlab/novel-writer | Command | 957 | 1y ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |