Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Workflowsio/company-os-starter-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.04915 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01966 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00983 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00492 |
Grade A, and why
workflows:plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 621 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create a plan for a new project or initiative
Introduction
Note: The current year is 2026. Use this when dating plans and searching for recent documentation.
The follow-on options at the end of this command call /deepen-plan and /technical_review, and the refine option loads the document-review skill. This kit ships none of the three. If one is not installed, skip that option, offer the rest, and say so rather than stopping.
Transform project descriptions, campaign briefs, or initiative ideas into well-structured markdown plans that follow project conventions and best practices. This command provides flexible detail levels to match your needs.
Project Description
<feature_description> #$ARGUMENTS </feature_description>
If the project description above is empty, ask the user: "What would you like to plan? Please describe the project, campaign, initiative, or improvement you have in mind."
Do not proceed until you have a clear project description from the user.
0. Idea Refinement
Check for brainstorm output first:
Before asking questions, look for recent brainstorm documents in docs/brainstorms/ that match this project:
ls -la docs/brainstorms/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -10
Relevance criteria: A brainstorm is relevant if:
- The topic (from filename or YAML frontmatter) semantically matches the project description
- Created within the last 14 days
- If multiple candidates match, use the most recent one
If a relevant brainstorm exists:
- Read the brainstorm document thoroughly - every section matters
- Announce: "Found brainstorm from [date]: [topic]. Using as foundation for planning."
- Extract and carry forward ALL of the following into the plan:
- Key decisions and their rationale
- Chosen approach and why alternatives were rejected
- Constraints and requirements discovered during brainstorming
- Open questions (flag these for resolution during planning)
- Success criteria and scope boundaries
- Any specific tool choices, targeting decisions, or channel strategies discussed
- Skip the idea refinement questions below - the brainstorm already answered WHAT to build
- Use brainstorm content as the primary input to research and planning phases
- Critical: The brainstorm is the origin document. Throughout the plan, reference specific decisions with
(see brainstorm: docs/brainstorms/<filename>)when carrying forward conclusions. Do not paraphrase decisions in a way that loses their original context - link back to the source. - Do not omit brainstorm content - if the brainstorm discussed it, the plan must address it (even if briefly). Scan each brainstorm section before finalizing the plan to verify nothing was dropped.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 621 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 38328a06e87e
workflows:plan is a command published in the GitHub repository Workflowsio/company-os-starter-kit (104 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 4,915 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-09.
workflows:plan compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| workflows:planWorkflowsio/company-os-starter-kit | Command | 104 | yesterday | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| _registry-protocolChappygo-OS/Atomic-Spec | Command | 10 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| mach12:gh-pr-readLeanAndMean/scramjet | Command | 8 | 8d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| scramjet:troubleshootLeanAndMean/scramjet | Command | 8 | 8d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 9 | Claude Code |
| gaai-auditdigipulse-engineering/GAAI-framework | Command | 163 | 8d ago | none | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| cold-startkunalsuri/ai-fication-kit | Command | 3 | 26d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 28 | GitHub Copilot |
| healthalexgreensh/token-optimizer | Command | 2.9k | yesterday | none | C | 28 | Claude Code |